Author
Listed:
- Vladimir Yakimov
(Central Marine Research and Design Institute)
- Oleg Gaidai
(Shanghai Ocean University)
- Jingxiang Xu
(Shanghai Ocean University)
- Fang Wang
(Shanghai Ocean University)
Abstract
One of the most important instruments used in engineering is the statistical prediction of extreme values. Engineering design should envisage structural disaster resilience, in particular to withstand harsh environmental conditions during system operations. For instance, extreme value analysis can forecast the extreme values of the environment's wind and waves as well as engineering responses and moments. Although a variety of statistical techniques are employed to forecast extreme values, it is imperative to improve statistical techniques in order to enable improved forecasting. The innovative deconvolution strategy put forth in this study is one such way. Data on measured wind speeds were utilized to benchmark and evaluate the approach. Additionally, this method is employed to foretell the extreme values of a unique subsea shuttle tanker (SST), a cutting-edge undersea freight tanker that transports CO2 to marginal fields. The novel deconvolution method’s results are validated against the modified Weibull extrapolation method. Time-domain-stimulated 2D planar Simulink model was used to generate representative underlying dynamic system dataset. The proposed methodology provides an accurate response to extreme value prediction utilizing all available data efficiently, which enables modelling and design optimizations of the SST. The proposed deconvolution method’s overall performance indicated that the extreme response prediction results of the dynamic vessel motion numerical simulations are robust and accurate. Significance and importance of this study lie within addressing state-of-art carbon capture and storage subsea system, in particular its safety and reliability design aspects.
Suggested Citation
Vladimir Yakimov & Oleg Gaidai & Jingxiang Xu & Fang Wang, 2023.
"Liquid carbon storage tanker disaster resilience,"
Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 746-757, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:43:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10669-023-09922-1
DOI: 10.1007/s10669-023-09922-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:43:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10669-023-09922-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.