IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v41y2021i2d10.1007_s10669-021-09801-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic long-term impact of clinical pathways: UPMC experience with hysterectomy patients

Author

Listed:
  • Ayesha Godiwala

    (University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health)

  • Suketu Mansuria

    (Magee Womens Research Institute
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine)

  • Robert P. Edwards

    (Magee Womens Research Institute
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine)

  • Faina Linkov

    (University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health
    Magee Womens Research Institute
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine)

Abstract

Clinical pathways are defined as evidence-based, multidisciplinary care algorithms that outline essential steps in the management of patients. Pathway implementation in healthcare and industries outside of healthcare demonstrated success in reduction of inefficiencies and elimination of waste of financial and other resources by standardizing processes. The UPMC Health System introduced an evidence-based pathway treatment algorithm for hysterectomy in 2012 with an overarching goal of reducing variations in surgical care and abdominal hysterectomy rates, thereby promoting cost containment and decreased patient morbidity. In 2016, we reported on the impact of hysterectomy pathways on the reduction of open hysterectomy rates and improved patient outcomes between 2012 and 2014. In this follow-up commentary, we looked at years 2015 to 2019 to evaluate the continued success of hysterectomy pathway initiative. Initial studies, as well as follow-up results, both led to the understanding that hysterectomy clinical pathways serve as an effective instrument in decreasing the rates of open hysterectomies, thus reducing complications and undesired practice variability while providing consistent care. We concluded that physician and patient factors that impact the utilization of hysterectomy pathways must be continuously monitored to ensure optimal quality of care for hysterectomy patients. Introduction of clinical pathways across health systems represent an opportunity to introduce a systematic and sustainable change with the goal of achieving improved health outcomes locally and globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayesha Godiwala & Suketu Mansuria & Robert P. Edwards & Faina Linkov, 2021. "Systemic long-term impact of clinical pathways: UPMC experience with hysterectomy patients," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 184-188, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:41:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-021-09801-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-021-09801-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-021-09801-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-021-09801-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zachary A. Collier & James H. Lambert & Igor Linkov, 2021. "Algorithms and models for decision making in advanced technology systems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 179-180, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:41:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-021-09801-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.