IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v31y2011i1d10.1007_s10669-010-9298-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electrokinetic extraction of lead from kaolinites: II. Experimental investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-non Hsu

    (Rikulau International Co. Ltd)

  • Albert T. Yeung

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Rajendra M. Menon

    (Regional Income Tax Agency)

Abstract

This is the second paper of two companion papers presenting the results of laboratory bench-scale experimental studies on electrokinetic extraction of lead from two different kaolinites. The theoretical formulation and numerical simulation of the process are presented in the first paper. Two different kaolinites were used in the study: (1) Georgia kaolinite and (2) Milwhite kaolinite. The lead spiked in Georgia kaolinite was highly mobilized and effectively extracted by the technique as the pH in the soil was significantly lowered by the electrokinetic process. Milwhite kaolinite has a much higher acid/base buffer capacity, and the required acidic environment could not be developed. As a result, removal of the lead spiked in Milwhite kaolinite was minimal. Comparison between simulations and experimental results is also presented. Factors affecting the cleanup efficiency of the process and potential enhancement techniques are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-non Hsu & Albert T. Yeung & Rajendra M. Menon, 2011. "Electrokinetic extraction of lead from kaolinites: II. Experimental investigation," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 33-38, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:31:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-010-9298-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-010-9298-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-010-9298-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-010-9298-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:31:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-010-9298-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.