IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v28y2008i2d10.1007_s10669-007-9031-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioremediation of aerobically treated distillery sludge mixed with cow dung by using an epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida

Author

Listed:
  • Surendra Suthar

    (S.G.N. Khalsa (PG) College)

Abstract

The potential of the epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida to stabilize sludge␣(generated from a distillation unit of the sugar industry) mixed with cow dung, in different proportions i.e. 20% (T1), 40% (T2), 60% (T3) and 80% (T4) has been studied under laboratory conditions for 90 days. The␣ready vermicompost was evaluated for its’ different physico-chemical parameters using standard methods. At the end of experiment, all vermibeds expressed a significant decrease in pH (7.8–19.2%) organic C (8.5–25.8%) content, and an increase in total N (130.4–170.7%), available P (22.2–120.8%), exchangeable K (104.9–159.5%), exchangeable Ca (49.1–118.1%), and exchangeable Mg (13.6–51.2%) content. Overall, earthworms could maximize decomposition and mineralization efficiency in bedding with lower proportions of distillery sludge. DTPA extractable metal reduction in substrate was recorded between the ranges of 12.5–38.8% for Zn, 5.9–30.4% for Fe, 4.7–38.2% for Mn and 4.5–42.1% for Cu. Maximum values for the mean individual live weight (809.69 ± 20.09 mg) and maximum individual growth rate (mg wt. worm−1 day−1) (5.81 ± 0.18) of earthworms was noted in T1 treatment, whereas cocoon numbers (69.0 ± 7.94) and individual reproduction rate (cocoon worm−1 day−1) (0.046 ± 0.002) was highest in T2 treatment. Earthworm mortality tended to increase with increasing proportion of distillery sludge, and maximum mortality in E. fetida was recorded for the T4 (45.0 ± 5.0) treatment. Results indicate that vermicomposting might be useful for managing the energy and nutrient rich distillery sludge on a low-input basis. Products of this process can be used for sustainable land restoration practices. The feasibility of worms to mitigate the toxicity of metals also reduces the possibility of soil contamination, which has been reported in earlier studies during direct field application of industrial wastes.

Suggested Citation

  • Surendra Suthar, 2008. "Bioremediation of aerobically treated distillery sludge mixed with cow dung by using an epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 76-84, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:28:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-007-9031-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-007-9031-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-007-9031-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-007-9031-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mukhtar Ahmed & Shakeel Ahmad & Fayyaz-ul-Hassan & Ghulam Qadir & Rifat Hayat & Farid Asif Shaheen & Muhammad Ali Raza, 2019. "Innovative Processes and Technologies for Nutrient Recovery from Wastes: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Grzegorz Pączka & Anna Mazur-Pączka & Mariola Garczyńska & Joanna Kostecka & Kevin R. Butt, 2020. "Effects of Vermireactor Modifications on the Welfare of Earthworms Eisenia fetida (Sav.) and Properties of Vermicomposts," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:28:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-007-9031-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.