IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i3d10.1007_s10668-023-04188-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of minimum sample size for testing proportion of non-Bt seeds under refuge-in-bag (RIB) for Bt cotton

Author

Listed:
  • V. Santhy

    (ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research (CICR))

  • G. Balasubramani

    (ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research (CICR))

  • Ankur Biswas

    (ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute (IASRI))

  • H. B. Santosh

    (ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research (CICR))

  • Megha Puttawar

    (ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research (CICR))

  • Pradnya Raut

    (ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research (CICR))

  • V. N. Waghmare

    (ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research (CICR))

  • Y. G. Prasad

    (ICAR – Central Institute for Cotton Research (CICR))

Abstract

Bt cotton has played a great role in bollworm management since its approval for commercial cultivation in India. To ensure the longevity of Bt technology, structured refuge was advocated wherein, the non-Bt seeds were provided as separate pack along with Bt seeds. Poor compliance of refuge planting is considered as a major factor for resistance development in Pink bollworm against Bt toxins and therefore, an alternate concept of refuge-in-bag (RIB) was recommended for Bt cotton. This strategy ensures automatic compliance of refuge, since a prescribed range (5–10%) of non-Bt seeds are blended with Bt seeds within each seed packet sold in the market. Since, Bt and non-Bt seeds are mixed and indistinguishable, assessment of Bt trait purity and ascertaining the proportion of refuge within each seed packet becomes critical for the success of RIB. A multi-phased study was conducted to determine the minimum seed sample size to be drawn and tested for RIB compliance in seed lots. Initially, the probable estimate to detect 5% non-Bt in blended seed lot was calculated theoretically which was later analyzed through visual observation of differentially colored seeds on various sample sizes. The minimum seed sample size thus arrived was validated through ELISA testing on a custom-built seed lot in which prescribed level of non-Bt seeds (5%) were blended with the Bt seeds. This was later revalidated using commercial Bt seed packets available in the open market. Based on the results, we propose a minimum sample size of 180 seeds which shall be tested individually for presence/absence of transgenes to determine proportion of non-Bt seeds in the Bt cotton seed packets. The need for strict care and critical cognizance by the seed producer organizations during the seed blending and packaging is specifically emphasized so as to ensure homogeneity of seed lot and prevent its possible misrepresentations. The proposed sample size may be used for ascertaining RIB compliance in the commercially available Bt cotton seed lots.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Santhy & G. Balasubramani & Ankur Biswas & H. B. Santosh & Megha Puttawar & Pradnya Raut & V. N. Waghmare & Y. G. Prasad, 2025. "Determination of minimum sample size for testing proportion of non-Bt seeds under refuge-in-bag (RIB) for Bt cotton," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 7243-7253, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04188-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04188-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04188-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04188-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04188-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.