IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i3d10.1007_s10668-023-04149-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability evaluation utilizing AHP and an ensemble model in a few landslide-prone areas of the Western Ghats, India

Author

Listed:
  • S. J. Anchima

    (Marian Engineering College)

  • A. Gokul

    (Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA))

  • Chandini P. C. Senan

    (Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA))

  • Jean Homian Danumah

    (Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny)

  • Sunil Saha

    (University of Gour Banga)

  • K. S. Sajinkumar

    (University of Kerala
    Michigan Technological University)

  • A. Rajaneesh

    (University of Kerala)

  • Alfred Johny

    (Kerala Agricultural University)

  • Pratheesh C. Mammen

    (Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA))

  • R. S. Ajin

    (Resilience Development Initiative (RDI))

Abstract

Landslides are among the most perilous hazards that usually happen in hilly terrains. The loss that ensues during a landslide, especially in highly-populated regions, calls for a vulnerability study. Thus, the purpose of this research is to detect landslide-vulnerable villages in a small part of the Western Ghats, an orographic mountain chain in South India that is proverbially prone to landslides. The study also evaluates the prediction capabilities of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and ensemble fuzzy-AHP (F-AHP) models. 22 vulnerability indicators (11 physical-environmental and 11 socio-economic) served as the basis for this modeling. These data, derived both from field studies and remotely sensed satellite data, were collated in a geographic information system (GIS) environment, and landslide vulnerability maps were generated. Landslide vulnerability modeling using AHP and F-AHP models found 12.07% and 4.53% of the region, respectively, as very high-vulnerable. The developed landslide vulnerability maps are validated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, Kappa index, mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) techniques. Based on the area under the ROC curve (AUC) scores, the landslide vulnerability maps developed utilizing these models were found to be outstanding. With an AUC score of 96.55% (0.96), the ensemble (F-AHP) was found to be more competent than the AHP model, which had an AUC value of 95.14% (0.95). The sensitivity, specificity, Kappa index, MSE, and RMSE values for the F-AHP model are 95.14%, 93.61%, 94.35%, 0.091, and 0.211, respectively, and for the AHP model, they are 92.93%, 94.04%, 92.45%, 0.099, and 0.228. Hence, in this study area, it can be affirmed that F-AHP is the better model for distinguishing vulnerable zones. As per the F-AHP model, Vellarada village is very highly vulnerable, and villages, namely Keezharoor and the western part of Peringamala, Vithura, and Mannoorkara, are highly vulnerable to landslides.

Suggested Citation

  • S. J. Anchima & A. Gokul & Chandini P. C. Senan & Jean Homian Danumah & Sunil Saha & K. S. Sajinkumar & A. Rajaneesh & Alfred Johny & Pratheesh C. Mammen & R. S. Ajin, 2025. "Vulnerability evaluation utilizing AHP and an ensemble model in a few landslide-prone areas of the Western Ghats, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 6423-6466, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04149-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04149-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04149-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04149-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04149-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.