IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i3d10.1007_s10668-023-04116-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building composite indicators for the territorial quality of life assessment in European regions: combining data reduction and alternative weighting techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Eda Ustaoglu

    (Abdullah Gul University)

  • Gloria Ortega Lopez

    (University of Almeria)

  • Alejandro Gutierrez-Alcoba

    (University of Edinburgh)

Abstract

Development of composite indicators is a challenging task given that sustainability indices are strongly dependent on how the sub-indicators are weighted. This is because relative indicator weights may significantly differ based on the chosen weighting methods used in the analysis. There is hardly any study that has paid attention to this issue so far. Therefore, this paper aims to fill this gap in the literature by searching the robustness of selected weighting methods, i.e. entropy-weight (EW), principal component analysis (PCA), machine learning approaches (random forest-RF), regression analysis (RA) and benefit-of-the-doubt (BOD) when constructing a composite indicator. To research the current sustainability performance of European regions, the present study focuses on the Territorial Quality of Life Index—initially proposed by the ESPON Programme—that are aligned with the specific targets of the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda. The methods to construct composite indicators include stages of data preparation (including the estimation of missing values with random forest method), normalization, statistical transformation of raw data, reduction of indicators in order to ease public communication (using the PCA method) and data interpretation, weighting of the sub-indicators using EW, PCA, RF, RA and BOD methods and their linear weighted aggregation, and checking for robustness and sensitivity. The results suggest that there are significant differences in the rank and spatial distribution of composite indicators based on the use of different weighting methods considered in the analysis. The results from sensitivity analysis support the robustness of entropy-weight method among others. The methodology used in the current analysis can be adapted to other study areas and regions internationally. The findings showed that Eastern European countries and some Mediterranean countries have relatively lower index values compared to other European regions; therefore, policy and planning actions are needed covering these regions specifically.

Suggested Citation

  • Eda Ustaoglu & Gloria Ortega Lopez & Alejandro Gutierrez-Alcoba, 2025. "Building composite indicators for the territorial quality of life assessment in European regions: combining data reduction and alternative weighting techniques," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 6025-6063, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04116-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04116-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04116-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04116-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04116-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.