IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i8d10.1007_s10668-023-03519-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Driving mechanism of the allometric relationship between economic development and carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China

Author

Listed:
  • Tiangui Lv

    (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
    Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics)

  • Han Hu

    (Hunan University)

  • Xinmin Zhang

    (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics)

  • Lu Sun

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University)

  • Zhaoling Li

    (Shanghai University)

  • Yijing Chen

    (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics)

  • Shufei Fu

    (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

Exploring the allometric characteristics and driving mechanisms of economic development (ED) and carbon emissions (CE) is significant for promoting regional sustainable development. This study applied the panel grey relational model and the Driscoll–Kraay estimation method to investigate the internal mechanism of economic development and carbon emissions, to analyse their spatiotemporal correlation and allometric characteristics, and finally to characterize the impact mechanism of their allometric growth of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration (YRDUA). The results show that (1) the spatiotemporal distribution patterns of economic development and carbon emissions are coincident and positively correlated, with the strength of the time-series correlation between them being less than the average value of 0.757 from 2016 onward. (2) The economic development-carbon emissions vertical allometric growth coefficient showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing and was always in a negative allometric growth state. The relative growth rate of carbon emissions was lower than that of economic development, and the per unit GDP carbon emissions decreased slightly. The horizontal allometric growth coefficient showed that more than 90% of the cities are in the negative allometric growth state, and that the negative allometric II and III levels are the main ones. (3) Per capita GDP, industrial structure, and energy structure are the boosting factors of the allometric growth coefficient, while population density and environmental regulation play a restraining role. Trade openness showed a restraining effect in 2010–2015 and turned into a promoting effect in 2016–2020. In both stages, the energy structure is one of the most crucial driving factors. The findings reported in this study can provide support for urban agglomerations to achieve low-carbon city development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiangui Lv & Han Hu & Xinmin Zhang & Lu Sun & Zhaoling Li & Yijing Chen & Shufei Fu, 2024. "Driving mechanism of the allometric relationship between economic development and carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21073-21096, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03519-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03519-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03519-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03519-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Chao & Haase, Dagmar & Su, Meirong & Yang, Zhifeng, 2019. "The impact of urban compactness on energy-related greenhouse gas emissions across EU member states: Population density vs physical compactness," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    2. Mahendra Kumar Singh & Deep Mukherjee, 2019. "Drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States: revisiting STIRPAT model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 3015-3031, December.
    3. Zhong, Zhangqi & Jiang, Lei & Zhou, Peng, 2018. "Transnational transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: Characteristics and determinants from a spatial perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 858-875.
    4. Liddle, Brantley, 2014. "Impact of population, age structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions/energy consumption: Evidence from macro-level, cross-country analyses," MPRA Paper 61306, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Jan Weiss & Andreas Stephan & Tatiana Anisimova, 2019. "Well-designed environmental regulation and firm performance: Swedish evidence on the Porter hypothesis and the effect of regulatory time strategies," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(2), pages 342-363, January.
    6. Long, Yin & Dong, Liang & Yoshida, Yoshikuni & Li, Zhaoling, 2018. "Evaluation of energy-related household carbon footprints in metropolitan areas of Japan," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 377(C), pages 16-25.
    7. Li, Li & Hong, Xuefei & Peng, Ke, 2019. "A spatial panel analysis of carbon emissions, economic growth and high-technology industry in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 83-92.
    8. Daniel Moran & Richard Wood & Edgar Hertwich & Kim Mattson & Joao F. D. Rodriguez & Karin Schanes & John Barrett, 2020. "Quantifying the potential for consumer-oriented policy to reduce European and foreign carbon emissions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(S1), pages 28-38, April.
    9. Zhang, Chuanguo & Lin, Yan, 2012. "Panel estimation for urbanization, energy consumption and CO2 emissions: A regional analysis in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 488-498.
    10. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Brown, Marilyn A., 2010. "Twelve metropolitan carbon footprints: A preliminary comparative global assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 4856-4869, September.
    11. Sun, Xudong & Li, Jiashuo & Qiao, Han & Zhang, Bo, 2017. "Energy implications of China's regional development: New insights from multi-regional input-output analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 118-131.
    12. Wang, Shaojian & Liu, Xiaoping & Zhou, Chunshan & Hu, Jincan & Ou, Jinpei, 2017. "Examining the impacts of socioeconomic factors, urban form, and transportation networks on CO2 emissions in China’s megacities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 189-200.
    13. Syeda Anam Hassan & Misbah Nosheen & Nazish Rafaz & Inayatul Haq, 2021. "Exploring the existence of aviation Kuznets curve in the context of environmental pollution for OECD nations," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15266-15289, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Long, Yin & Yoshida, Yoshikuni & Fang, Kai & Zhang, Haoran & Dhondt, Maya, 2019. "City-level household carbon footprint from purchaser point of view by a modified input-output model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 379-387.
    2. Wang, Shaojian & Xie, Zihan & Wu, Rong & Feng, Kuishang, 2022. "How does urbanization affect the carbon intensity of human well-being? A global assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    3. Wang, Wei-Zheng & Liu, Lan-Cui & Liao, Hua & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2021. "Impacts of urbanization on carbon emissions: An empirical analysis from OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Yuxin Liu & Chenjing Fan & Dongdong Xue, 2024. "A Review of the Effects of Urban and Green Space Forms on the Carbon Budget Using a Landscape Sustainability Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-29, February.
    5. Lau, Chi Keung & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Rather, Kashif Nesar & Gozgor, Giray, 2023. "The impact of green quality of the energy consumption on carbon emissions in the United States," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 850-860.
    6. Li, Jianglong & Sun, Shiqiang & Sharma, Disha & Ho, Mun Sing & Liu, Hongxun, 2023. "Tracking the drivers of global greenhouse gas emissions with spillover effects in the post-financial crisis era," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Song, Weize & Zhang, Xiaoling & An, Kangxin & Yang, Tao & Li, Heng & Wang, Can, 2021. "Quantifying the spillover elasticities of urban built environment configurations on the adjacent traffic CO2 emissions in mainland China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    8. Vélez-Henao, Johan-Andrés & Font Vivanco, David & Hernández-Riveros, Jesús-Antonio, 2019. "Technological change and the rebound effect in the STIRPAT model: A critical view," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1372-1381.
    9. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Loganathan, Nanthakumar & Muzaffar, Ahmed Taneem & Ahmed, Khalid & Ali Jabran, Muhammad, 2016. "How urbanization affects CO2 emissions in Malaysia? The application of STIRPAT model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 83-93.
    10. Wang, Shaojian & Zeng, Jingyuan & Liu, Xiaoping, 2019. "Examining the multiple impacts of technological progress on CO2 emissions in China: A panel quantile regression approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 140-150.
    11. Dalia M. Ibrahiem, 2018. "Road energy consumption, economic growth, population and urbanization in Egypt: cointegration and causality analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1053-1066, June.
    12. Paul-Razvan Șerban & Monica Dumitrașcu & Bianca Mitrică & Ines Grigorescu & Irena Mocanu & Gheorghe Kucsicsa & Alexandra Vrînceanu & Cristina Dumitrică, 2020. "The Estimation of Regional Energy Consumption Based on the Energy Consumption Rate at National Level. Case Study: The Romanian Danube Valley," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Mohammed Hadi & George Campbell, 2020. "Relationship among Energy Consumption, Inflation, Human Capital and Economic Growth: Evidence from Indonesia," International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Online Academic Press, vol. 6(2), pages 85-92.
    14. Yang Ding & Qing Yang & Lanjuan Cao, 2021. "Examining the Impacts of Economic, Social, and Environmental Factors on the Relationship between Urbanization and CO 2 Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Abdul Rehman & Magdalena Radulescu & Laura Mariana Cismas & Rafael Alvarado & Carmen Gabriela Secara & Claudia Tolea, 2022. "Urbanization, Economic Development, and Environmental Degradation: Investigating the Role of Renewable Energy Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Lv, Yulan & Chen, Wei & Cheng, Jianquan, 2019. "Modelling dynamic impacts of urbanization on disaggregated energy consumption in China: A spatial Durbin modelling and decomposition approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Adams, Samuel & Klobodu, Edem Kwame Mensah, 2017. "Urbanization, democracy, bureaucratic quality, and environmental degradation," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 1035-1051.
    18. Xia, Chuyu & Chen, Bin, 2020. "Urban land-carbon nexus based on ecological network analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    19. You, Geonhwa, 2024. "A comprehensive approach for calibrating anthropogenic effects on atmosphere degradation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Qianyuan Huang & Guangdong Chen & Chao Xu & Weiyu Jiang & Meirong Su, 2021. "Spatial Variation of the Effect of Multidimensional Urbanization on PM 2.5 Concentration in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03519-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.