IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i7d10.1007_s10668-023-03418-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic growth and carbon emissions analysis based on tapio-ekc coupled integration and scenario simulation: a case study of china's transportation industry

Author

Listed:
  • Lingchun Hou

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Yuanping Wang

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Lang Hu

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Ying Wang

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Yuelong Li

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Yingheng Zheng

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

The transportation industry (TRAI) is an important source of carbon emissions for China to achieve its peak carbon and carbon neutrality targets. This study analyzes the coupled integration of TRAI economic growth and carbon emissions in 30 Chinese provinces from 2005 to 2020 using a Tapio decoupling elasticity model and an environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) model. Then, a long-term energy alternative planning (LEAP) system model was constructed to predict and simulate the development of TRAI in China. The results of the study are as follows. (1) TRAI shows an inverted U-shaped decoupling in most provinces across the country, and most of the decoupling is usually more volatile in provinces with higher levels of economic development. In addition, COVID-19 positively contributes to the development of TRAI nationwide and in three regions. (2) The Tapio-EKC coupling curves of TRAI and eastern TRAI (ETRAI) nationwide have an inverted N-shape, and central TRAI (CTRAI) and western TRAI (WTRAI) have an inverted U-shape. Twenty-seven provinces crossed the decoupling elasticity inflection point nationwide, all provinces of ETRAI crossed the EKC inflection point, while all provinces of CTRAI and WTRAI did not cross the EKC inflection point; (3) The carbon reduction rates after scenario simulation ranged from 5.07 to 54.94%, with aircraft, ships, private vehicles, and their fuels (aviation kerosene, diesel, and gasoline) being the focus of energy saving and emission reduction. The coupled Tapio-EKC analysis model of this study is universal and can be extended to other provinces, cities, or industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingchun Hou & Yuanping Wang & Lang Hu & Ying Wang & Yuelong Li & Yingheng Zheng, 2024. "Economic growth and carbon emissions analysis based on tapio-ekc coupled integration and scenario simulation: a case study of china's transportation industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 18855-18881, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03418-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03418-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03418-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03418-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yipeng Liu & Jong Min Lee & Celia Lee, 2020. "The challenges and opportunities of a global health crisis: the management and business implications of COVID-19 from an Asian perspective," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 277-297, July.
    2. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    3. Zhang, Qiang & Tong, Qiong, 2021. "The economic impacts of traffic consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: A CGE analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 330-337.
    4. Balram Ambade & Tapan Kumar Sankar & Amit Kumar & Alok Sagar Gautam & Sneha Gautam, 2021. "COVID-19 lockdowns reduce the Black carbon and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of the Asian atmosphere: source apportionment and health hazard evaluation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12252-12271, August.
    5. Li, Yongling & Wang, Jiaoe & Huang, Jie & Chen, Zhuo, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 on domestic air transportation in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 95-103.
    6. Lingchun Hou & Yuanping Wang & Yingheng Zheng & Aomei Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Vehicle Ownership on Carbon Emissions in the Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Shafik, Nemat & Bandyopadhyay, Sushenjit, 1992. "Economic growth and environmental quality : time series and cross-country evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 904, The World Bank.
    8. Shan, Yuli & Liu, Jianghua & Liu, Zhu & Xu, Xinwanghao & Shao, Shuai & Wang, Peng & Guan, Dabo, 2016. "New provincial CO2 emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 742-750.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bingjie Xu & Ruoyu Zhong & Yifeng Liu, 2019. "Comparison of CO 2 emissions reduction efficiency of household fuel consumption in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Michael Greenstone & Rema Hanna, 2014. "Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3038-3072, October.
    3. Song, Tao & Zheng, Tingguo & Tong, Lianjun, 2008. "An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 381-392, September.
    4. Nora Yusma Mohamed Yusoff & Hussain Ali Bekhet & S.M. Mahrwarz, 2020. "Dynamic Relationships between Energy Use, Income, and Environmental Degradation in Afghanistan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 51-61.
    5. Bradford David F. & Fender Rebecca A & Shore Stephen H. & Wagner Martin, 2005. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Exploring a Fresh Specification," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-28, June.
    6. Ghimire, Narishwar & Woodward, Richard T., 2013. "Under- and over-use of pesticides: An international analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 73-81.
    7. Jha, Raghbendra & Murthy, K. V. Bhanu, 2003. "An inverse global environmental Kuznets curve," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 352-368, June.
    8. Sebri, Maamar, 2009. "La Zone Méditerranéenne Face à la Pollution de L’air : Une Investigation Econométrique [The Mediterranean Zone in front of Air pollution: an Econometric Investigation]," MPRA Paper 32382, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Muhammad Shahbaz & Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad & Mantu Kumar Mahalik & Perry Sadorsky, 2018. "How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? A country-specific time-series and panel analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(13), pages 1479-1494, March.
    10. George Halkos & Iacovos Psarianos, 2016. "Exploring the effect of including the environment in the neoclassical growth model," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 18(3), pages 339-358, July.
    11. Fabian Knorre & Martin Wagner & Maximilian Grupe, 2021. "Monitoring Cointegrating Polynomial Regressions: Theory and Application to the Environmental Kuznets Curves for Carbon and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-35, March.
    12. Saidi Kais & Ben Mbarek Mounir, 2017. "Causal interactions between environmental degradation, renewable energy, nuclear energy and real GDP: a dynamic panel data approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 51-67, March.
    13. Rothman, Dale S., 1998. "Environmental Kuznets curves--real progress or passing the buck?: A case for consumption-based approaches," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 177-194, May.
    14. Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Adnan Hye, Qazi Muhammad, 2013. "The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: Cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 519-527.
    15. Hongbo Liu & Hanho Kim & Shuanglu Liang & Oh-Sang Kwon, 2018. "Export Diversification and Ecological Footprint: A Comparative Study on EKC Theory among Korea, Japan, and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-12, October.
    16. Fodha, Mouez & Zaghdoud, Oussama, 2010. "Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: An empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 1150-1156, February.
    17. Ang, James B., 2007. "CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4772-4778, October.
    18. Andreoni, James & Levinson, Arik, 2001. "The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 269-286, May.
    19. Francesco Nicolli & Marianna Gilli & Francesco Vona, 2022. "Inequality and Climate Change: Two Problems, One Solution?," Working Papers 2022.32, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    20. Raghbendra Jha & John Whalley, 2001. "The Environmental Regime in Developing Countries," NBER Chapters, in: Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, pages 217-250, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03418-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.