IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i2d10.1007_s10668-023-02929-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal allocation of water pollutant discharge permits based on Environmental Gini Coefficient (EGC): a case study of Qinhuai river basin in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Bei Guan

    (Nanjing Research Institute of Ecology and Environmental Protection)

  • Xiuqiong Liang

    (College of Resources, Environment and Materials)

  • Yang Yang

    (Nanjing University)

  • Xiang Sun

    (College of Resources, Environment and Materials)

  • Jiawei Wang

    (College of Resources, Environment and Materials)

  • Danyi Wei

    (College of Resources, Environment and Materials)

  • Bin Wang

    (College of Resources, Environment and Materials)

  • Han Cheng

    (Nanjing Research Institute of Ecology and Environmental Protection)

Abstract

Under the constraint of water environmental carrying capacity, it is effective and insightful to control wastewater discharge and allocate water pollutant discharge permits for each pollution sources (or watershed control units) targeting at alleviating the pressure of water contamination. With a case study of Qinhuai river basin of Nanjing, China, water environmental capacity and top-down mandatory pollutants discharge reduction management were incorporated into water pollutant discharge permits decision system. In this study, a weighted multi-criteria environmental Gini coefficient method consisting of social (population), economic (gross value of industrial output), environmental (water environmental carrying capacity) and natural (land area) concerns was proposed to allocate the water pollutant discharge total phosphorus (TP) and NH3–N permits. Subsequently, based on the dual goals of minimum ECG under the constraint of water environmental carrying capacity and the limits of pollutants discharge reduction rate, the current discharge distribution, discharge permits distribution and discharge reduction distribution after allocation optimization of TP and NH3–N were obtained. The results showed that: (1) The water pollutant discharge (TP and NH3–N) permits exert a patchy configuration, and most of the watershed control units were suggested to reduce the emission by 60%. (2) After optimization, the Gini coefficients for NH3–N were lower, while the Gini coefficients for TP were increased slightly. (3) The total Gini coefficient for TP and NH3–N were all below 0.2, illustrating the water pollutant discharge permits are equity. The study shall be helpful to the policymakers to formulate total mass of pollutants control in environmental management and provide reference of further implementation of pollutant discharge permits trading system.

Suggested Citation

  • Bei Guan & Xiuqiong Liang & Yang Yang & Xiang Sun & Jiawei Wang & Danyi Wei & Bin Wang & Han Cheng, 2024. "Optimal allocation of water pollutant discharge permits based on Environmental Gini Coefficient (EGC): a case study of Qinhuai river basin in Nanjing, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 5179-5198, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-023-02929-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-02929-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-02929-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-02929-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-023-02929-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.