IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i12d10.1007_s10668-024-04464-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gap between knowledge and action: understanding the consistency of farmers’ ecological cognition and green production behavior in Hainan Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Weiqin Li

    (International Business School of Hainan University)

  • Dan Qiao

    (International Business School of Hainan University)

  • Qinchuan Hao

    (International Business School of Hainan University)

  • Yifan Ji

    (International Business School of Hainan University)

  • Donghui Chen

    (International Business School of Hainan University)

  • Tao Xu

    (International Business School of Hainan University)

Abstract

The pivotal role of greening production methods is indispensable in facilitating the sustainable development of China’s agricultural sector and its modernization process. Translating farmers’ ecological cognition into environmentally conscious production behavior constitutes a fundamental strategy for advancing the green transformation within China’s agriculture. However, a recurrent issue arises from an inconsistency between farmers’ green production behavior and their ecological cognition. Meanwhile, the current research has fewer studies on the consistency of farmers’ cognition and behavior, and more analysis of the logical hierarchical relationship between their influencing factors needs to be done. Based on a field survey of 399 farmers in Hainan Province, this paper first employs descriptive statistics to assess the consistency of farmers’ ecological cognition with their green production behavior. Second, this study uses a Logistic model and Interpretative Structural Model (ISM) to empirically analyze the factors influencing such consistency and the internal logical relationships of these factors. The results reveal that merely 28% of farmers exhibit consistency between their ecological cognition and green production practices. Secondly, education level, health status, political capital, household expenditure, planting scales, risk preference, peer influences, policy cognition, social networks, and information acquisition significantly influence this “consistency.” Thirdly, the logical hierarchical relationships established via the ISM indicate that peer influences and risk preference are the surface direct factors; policy cognition, information acquisition, social networks, and planting scales are middle indirect factors; education level, political capital, health status, and household expenditure are deep-rooted factors that underpin the entire framework. Given these insights, this study recommends that the government undertake initiatives to reinforce education and training programs, enhance accessibility to information and technical support, and tailor policies to accommodate small-scale farmers. This study endeavor contributes to an enhanced comprehension of the factors influencing the transformation of farmers’ ecological cognition into green production behavior, also presenting pragmatic policy proposals to advance sustainable agriculture in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiqin Li & Dan Qiao & Qinchuan Hao & Yifan Ji & Donghui Chen & Tao Xu, 2024. "Gap between knowledge and action: understanding the consistency of farmers’ ecological cognition and green production behavior in Hainan Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 31251-31275, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04464-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04464-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04464-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04464-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04464-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.