IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i11d10.1007_s10668-023-03798-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The European Union (EU) green taxonomy: codifying sustainability to provide certainty to the markets

Author

Listed:
  • Patrizia Tettamanzi

    (LIUC – Cattaneo University)

  • Riccardo Gotti Tedeschi

    (European Company Law Firm)

  • Michael Murgolo

    (LIUC – Cattaneo University)

Abstract

This study aims at making the potential implications of the ‘Green’ Taxonomy implementation emerge. The EU (European Union) regulatory framework on sustainability-related issues and the regulatory action in the area of non-financial or ESG (environmental, social and governance) reporting have highlighted the need for more academic contributions. There could, indeed, be a risk of oversimplification of an issue that cannot be solved without considering its practical implications on the stakeholders affected. Hence, failing to think these through might result in tragic consequences from a societal standpoint, despite being outstanding from an environmental one. This critical analysis, thus, investigates a few crucial points pertaining to the EU ‘Green’ Taxonomy—as the latest classification system for environmentally sustainable economic activities proposed by the EU—with the aim of providing academics and policymakers with a balanced report between theory and practice. By means of archival data, content analysis and bibliometric techniques, and implementing the steps of the systematic literature network analysis (SLNA) protocol which were deemed pertinent for the purposes of our study, we conducted a documentary review regarding the EU Taxonomy. Based on this critical analysis, we were able to outline (a) the rationale of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, (b) its structure, (c) its ability to improve corporate environmental performance and (d) the role played by specific nuclear and gas energy activities for a climate-neutral future. Every economic choice implies a cultural choice, and economics—unlike natural sciences—is essentially based on decisions, which can be influenced. The study, thus, concludes with proposals for future research and potential improvements of EU frameworks in order to support an efficient achievement of the Green Deal objectives and the 2030 Agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrizia Tettamanzi & Riccardo Gotti Tedeschi & Michael Murgolo, 2024. "The European Union (EU) green taxonomy: codifying sustainability to provide certainty to the markets," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27111-27136, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03798-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03798-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03798-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03798-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelon, Giovanna & Rodrigue, Michelle & Trevisan, Elisabetta, 2020. "The marketization of a social movement: Activists, shareholders and CSR disclosure," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Andrea Liesen & Andreas G. Hoepner & Dennis M. Patten & Frank Figge, 2015. "Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(7), pages 1047-1074, September.
    3. Cojoianu, Theodor F. & Clark, Gordon L. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Veneri, Paolo & Wójcik, Dariusz, 2020. "Entrepreneurs for a low carbon world: How environmental knowledge and policy shape the creation and financing of green start-ups," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    4. Dumrose, Maurice & Rink, Sebastian & Eckert, Julia, 2022. "Disaggregating confusion? The EU Taxonomy and its relation to ESG rating," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    5. Kwasi Gyau Baffour Awuah & Raymond T. Abdulai, 2022. "Urban Land and Development Management in a Challenged Developing World: An Overview of New Reflections," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Maurizio Massaro & John Dumay & James Guthrie, 2016. "On the shoulders of giants: undertaking a structured literature review in accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 767-801, June.
    7. Michele Siri & Shanshan Zhu, 2019. "Will the EU Commission Successfully Integrate Sustainability Risks and Factors in the Investor Protection Regime? A Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Samuel Nana Yaw Simpson & Francis Aboagye-Otchere & Rhoda Ahadzie, 2022. "Assurance of environmental, social and governance disclosures in a developing country: perspectives of regulators and quasi-regulators," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 109-133, April.
    9. Maryam Safari & Amreen Areeb, 2020. "A qualitative analysis of GRI principles for defining sustainability report quality: an Australian case from the preparers’ perspective," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 344-375, October.
    10. Francisco Ascui & Heather Lovell, 2011. "As frames collide: making sense of carbon accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(8), pages 978-999, October.
    11. Caterina Lucarelli & Camilla Mazzoli & Michela Rancan & Sabrina Severini, 2020. "Classification of Sustainable Activities: EU Taxonomy and Scientific Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-25, August.
    12. John Margerison & Mingyue Fan & Frank Birkin, 2019. "The prospects for environmental accounting and accountability in China," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 327-347, July.
    13. Lorenzo Esposito & Giuseppe Mastromatteo & Andrea Molocchi, 2021. "Extending ‘environment-risk weighted assets’: EU taxonomy and banking supervision," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 214-232, July.
    14. Lorenzo Esposito & Giuseppe Mastromatteo & Andrea Molocchi & Paola Cristina Brambilla & Maria Leonor Carvalho & Pierpaolo Girardi & Benedetta Marmiroli & Giulio Mela, 2022. "Green Mortgages, EU Taxonomy and Environment Risk Weighted Assets: A Key Link for the Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-31, January.
    15. Alessio Faccia & Francesco Manni & Fabian Capitanio, 2021. "Mandatory ESG Reporting and XBRL Taxonomies Combination: ESG Ratings and Income Statement, a Sustainable Value-Added Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Alessio M. Pacces, 2021. "Will the EU Taxonomy Regulation Foster Sustainable Corporate Governance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    17. Alessi, Lucia & Ossola, Elisa & Panzica, Roberto, 2021. "What greenium matters in the stock market? The role of greenhouse gas emissions and environmental disclosures," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kentaro Azuma & Akira Higashida, 2024. "Climate change disclosure and evolving institutional investor salience: Roles of the Principles for Responsible Investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3669-3686, May.
    2. Kiswanto Kiswanto & Ain Hajawiyah & Atta Putra Harjanto & Endah Tri Setyarini, 2023. "Twelve Years Research Journey of Carbon Accounting," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 246-254, July.
    3. Timo Busch & Charles H. Cho & Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Giovanna Michelon & Joeri Rogelj, 2023. "Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emissions’ Data and the Urgent Need for a Science-Led Just Transition: Introduction to a Thematic Symposium," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 897-901, February.
    4. Dumrose, Maurice & Rink, Sebastian & Eckert, Julia, 2022. "Disaggregating confusion? The EU Taxonomy and its relation to ESG rating," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    5. Maurizio Comoli & Patrizia Tettamanzi & Michael Murgolo, 2023. "Accounting for ‘ESG’ under Disruptions: A Systematic Literature Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    6. Nusirat Ojuolape Gold & Fauziah Md. Taib & Yaxin Ma, 2022. "Firm-Level Attributes, Industry-Specific Factors, Stakeholder Pressure, and Country-Level Attributes: Global Evidence of What Inspires Corporate Sustainability Practices and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Qaisar Ali & Sulistya Rusgianto & Shazia Parveen & Hakimah Yaacob & Razali Mat Zin, 2024. "An empirical study of the effects of green Sukuk spur on economic growth, social development, and financial performance in Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21097-21123, August.
    8. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    9. Ladislava Volková, 2022. "Carbon reporting: evidence from the Czech financial sector [Uhlíková stopa: Udržitelné výkaznictví českého finančního sektoru v ČR]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(2), pages 69-87.
    10. Stefano D’Angelo & Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Francesco Di Lorenzo, 2024. "Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3719-3774, December.
    11. Xiaojun Zhang & Weiqiao Wang & Yunan Bai & Yong Ye, 2022. "How Has China Structured Its Ecological Governance Policy System?—A Case from Fujian Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Qing Yin & Delu Wang & Yadong Wang, 2023. "Serial Mediation Model Linking Returnee Entrepreneurship Education and Green Returnee Entrepreneurial Behavior: An Analysis of Environmental Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Ionela Ursu & Iuliana Georgescu, 2022. "Planning With Or Without Budgets? The €Œnew Controlling†Approach," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 30, pages 105-118, December.
    14. Saddam A. Hazaea & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Khaldoon Albitar & Jinyu Zhu, 2023. "Internal Auditing in the Arab World: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    15. Lanzalonga Federico & Chmet Federico & Petrolo Basilio & Brescia Valerio, 2023. "Exploring Diversity Management to Avoid Social Washing and Pinkwashing: Using Bibliometric Analysis to Shape Future Research Directions," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 41-65, March.
    16. Davidescu, Adriana AnaMaria & Popovici, Oana Cristina & Strat, Vasile Alecsandru, 2022. "Estimating the impact of green ESIF in Romania using input-output model," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Del Vecchio, Pasquale & Secundo, Giustina & Garzoni, Antonello, 2023. "Phygital technologies and environments for breakthrough innovation in customers' and citizens' journey. A critical literature review and future agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Dimes, Ruth & de Villiers, Charl, 2024. "Hallmarks of Integrated Thinking," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    19. Yuhanis Ladewi & Meiryani Meiryani & Ahmad Syamil & Agustini Agustini & Agustinus Winoto, 2024. "The Relation between Climate Change and Carbon Emission Trading: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 686-697, January.
    20. Benjamin Dennis, 2022. "Climate Change and Financial Policy: A Literature Review," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2022-048, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03798-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.