IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i10d10.1007_s10668-023-03716-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will green technological progress help industrial collaborative agglomeration increase regional carbon productivity: evidence from Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations

Author

Listed:
  • Weijun He

    (China Three Gorges University)

  • Yizhan Li

    (China Three Gorges University)

  • Xu Meng

    (China Three Gorges University)

  • Mengfei Song

    (China Three Gorges University)

  • Thomas Stephen Ramsey

    (China Three Gorges University)

  • Min An

    (China Three Gorges University
    China Three Gorges University)

Abstract

Carbon emission goals need China to upgrade its industrial structure to formulate a low-carbon economy. As a new form of industrial structure change, manufacturing and production service industries influence each other and become a collaborative agglomeration. This trend may have some impacts on carbon productivity. However, little research has been conducted whether and how the industrial collaborative agglomeration affects carbon productivity. To fill this research gap, this study employed panel data of 27 cities in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations region from 2006 to 2020. First, by using the location entropy index, this study assessed the degree with regard to the collaborative agglomeration index of manufacturing and production services in the cities of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations. Second, the study used a non-radial non-angular SBM model with the global Malmquist-Luenberger index to decompose the green technological progress index from each city’s green total factor productivity. Third, this paper also used a mediating effect model to determine whether green technological progress played a mediating role with regard to the effect among industrial collaboration agglomeration and carbon productivity. The results indicate that (1) Industrial collaborative agglomeration significantly increased carbon productivity and green technological progress, with the industrial collaboration agglomeration index increasing by 1%, carbon productivity increasing by 28.8%, and green technological progress index increasing by 5.3%. (2) Green technological progress shows a significant partial mediating effect in carbon productivity effects of industrial collaborative agglomeration, with the mediating effect accounting for 19.82% of the overall effect. (3) There was a heterogeneity effect between high-end productive service and manufacturing industries collaborative agglomeration along with traditional productive service and manufacturing industries collaborative agglomeration. Former collaborative agglomeration increased 1%, carbon productivity increased by 37.9% and the mediating effect of collaborative agglomeration on carbon productivity through green technological progress accounted for 23.18% of the total effect. This mediating effect was not significant for traditional productive service and manufacturing industries collaborative agglomeration. This paper can provide some suggestions for construction of a low-carbon economy in Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations to improve the cities’ carbon productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Weijun He & Yizhan Li & Xu Meng & Mengfei Song & Thomas Stephen Ramsey & Min An, 2024. "Will green technological progress help industrial collaborative agglomeration increase regional carbon productivity: evidence from Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26019-26046, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03716-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03716-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03716-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03716-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weiliang Chen & Xinjian Huang & Yanhong Liu & Yan Song, 2019. "Does Industry Integration Improve the Competitiveness of China’s Electronic Information Industry?—Evidence from the Integration of the Electronic Information Industry and Financial Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Yaoshan Ma & Qingyu Yao, 2022. "Impact of Producer Service Agglomeration on Carbon Emission Efficiency and Its Mechanism: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Ya Wen & Meng Liao, 2019. "The Impact of Industrial Agglomeration on Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from China," International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Conscientia Beam, vol. 8(2), pages 67-78.
    4. Ellison, Glenn & Glaeser, Edward L, 1997. "Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(5), pages 889-927, October.
    5. Edward L. Glaeser & Glenn Ellison, 1999. "The Geographic Concentration of Industry: Does Natural Advantage Explain Agglomeration?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(2), pages 311-316, May.
    6. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    7. Tianling Zhang & Panda Su & Hongbing Deng, 2021. "Does the Agglomeration of Producer Services and the Market Entry of Enterprises Promote Carbon Reduction? An Empirical Analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Glenn Ellison & Edward L. Glaeser & William R. Kerr, 2010. "What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 1195-1213, June.
    9. Claudio Di Berardino & Gianni Onesti, 2018. "Services, Vertical Linkages, and Development: The Case of the Baltic Countries," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 149-167, March.
    10. Moriki Hosoe & Tohru Naito, 2006. "Trans‐boundary pollution transmission and regional agglomeration effects," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(1), pages 99-120, March.
    11. Xing, Wan & Ye, Xuan & Kui, Lv, 2011. "Measuring convergence of China's ICT industry: An input-output analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 301-313, May.
    12. Wenwen Li & Wenping Wang & Yu Wang & Yingbo Qin, 2017. "Industrial structure, technological progress and CO2 emissions in China: Analysis based on the STIRPAT framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(3), pages 1545-1564, September.
    13. Ya Wen & Meng Liao, 2019. "The Impact of Industrial Agglomeration on Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from China," International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Conscientia Beam, vol. 8(2), pages 67-78.
    14. Ryan M. Gallagher, 2013. "Shipping Costs, Information Costs, And The Sources Of Industrial Coagglomeration," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 304-331, May.
    15. Shanzi Ke & Ming He & Chenhua Yuan, 2014. "Synergy and Co-agglomeration of Producer Services and Manufacturing: A Panel Data Analysis of Chinese Cities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(11), pages 1829-1841, November.
    16. Peng, Dan & Li, Rongrong & Shen, Chenrong & Wong, Zoey, 2022. "Industrial agglomeration, urban characteristics, and economic growth quality: The case of knowledge-intensive business services," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 18-28.
    17. Barry P. Bosworth & Jack E. Triplett, 2007. "The Early 21st Century U.S. Productivity Expansion is Still in Services," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 14, pages 3-19, Spring.
    18. Fare, Rolf & Shawna Grosskopf & Mary Norris & Zhongyang Zhang, 1994. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(1), pages 66-83, March.
    19. Lei Gao & Jingran Zhang & Yu Tian & Xinyu Liu & Shuxin Guan & Yuhong Wu, 2023. "Study on the Impact of Collaborative Agglomeration of Manufacturing and Producer Services on PM 2.5 Pollution: Evidence from Urban Agglomerations in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Hongman Liu & Shibin Wen & Zhuang Wang, 2022. "Agricultural production agglomeration and total factor carbon productivity: based on NDDF–MML index analysis," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(4), pages 709-740, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu Zhang & Renyan Mu & Nigatu Mengesha Fentaw & Yuanfang Zhan & Feng Zhang & Jixin Zhang, 2022. "Industrial Coagglomeration, Green Innovation, and Manufacturing Carbon Emissions: Coagglomeration’s Dynamic Evolution Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Federico Curci, 2015. "The taller the better? Agglomeration determinants and urban structure," ERSA conference papers ersa15p991, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Haochang Yang & Faming Zhang & Yixin He, 2021. "Exploring the effect of producer services and manufacturing industrial co-agglomeration on the ecological environment pollution control in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16119-16144, November.
    4. Jordi Jofre-Monseny & Raquel Marín-López & Elisabet Viladecans-Marsal, 2012. "What underlies localization and urbanization economies? Evidence from the location of new firms," Working Papers 2012/9, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    5. Xiwei Zhu & Ye Liu & Ming He & Deming Luo & Yiyun Wu, 2019. "Entrepreneurship and industrial clusters: evidence from China industrial census," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 595-616, March.
    6. Luis Cabral & Zhu Wang & Daniel Yi Xu, 2018. "Competitor, Complementors, Parents and Places: Explaining Regional Agglomeration in the U.S. Auto Industry," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 30, pages 1-29, October.
    7. Kristian Behrens & W. Mark Brown & Théophile Bougna, 2018. "The World Is Not Yet Flat: Transport Costs Matter!," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(4), pages 712-724, October.
    8. William R. Kerr & Scott Duke Kominers, 2015. "Agglomerative Forces and Cluster Shapes," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(4), pages 877-899, October.
    9. Thomas McGregor & Samuel Wills, 2016. "Surfing A Wave Of Economic Growth," OxCarre Working Papers 170, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.
    10. Di Giacinto, Valter & Pagnini, Marcello, 2011. "Local and global agglomeration patterns: Two econometrics-based indicators," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 266-280, May.
    11. Alje van Dam & Andres Gomez‐Lievano & Frank Neffke & Koen Frenken, 2023. "An information‐theoretic approach to the analysis of location and colocation patterns," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 173-213, January.
    12. Gathmann, Christina & Helm, Ines & Schönberg, Uta, 2014. "Spillover Effects in Local Labor Markets: Evidence from Mass Layoffs," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100378, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    13. Edward L. Glaeser & William R. Kerr, 2009. "Local Industrial Conditions and Entrepreneurship: How Much of the Spatial Distribution Can We Explain?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 623-663, September.
    14. Glenn Ellison & Edward L. Glaeser & William R. Kerr, 2010. "What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 1195-1213, June.
    15. Matias Nehuen Iglesias, 2021. "The Overlooked Insights from Correlation Structures in Economic Geography," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2105, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2021.
    16. Thomas J. Holmes & Sanghoon Lee, 2012. "Economies of Density versus Natural Advantage: Crop Choice on the Back Forty," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(1), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Todd M. Gabe & Jaison R. Abel, 2016. "Shared Knowledge and the Coagglomeration of Occupations," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(8), pages 1360-1373, August.
    18. Wouter Jacobs & Hans R. A. Koster & Frank van Oort, 2014. "Co-agglomeration of knowledge-intensive business services and multinational enterprises," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 443-475.
    19. Diego Puga, 2010. "The Magnitude And Causes Of Agglomeration Economies," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 203-219, February.
    20. Edward L. Glaeser & Sari Pekkala Kerr & William R. Kerr, 2015. "Entrepreneurship and Urban Growth: An Empirical Assessment with Historical Mines," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(2), pages 498-520, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03716-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.