IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i3d10.1007_s10668-022-02158-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing conservation attitudes of mountain communities under different resource management regimes in northern Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Zafar Khan

    (Karakoram International University (KIU))

  • Sayeed Murad Shah

    (Karakoram International University (KIU))

  • Athar Ali Khan

    (Washington State University)

Abstract

Worldwide protected areas (PAs) of various categories are established to address human-induced biodiversity losses. This emerging system of land use greatly influences peoples’ attitudes, which has been used as an indicator and predictor to evaluate the success of conservation programmes. In this study, we have assessed conservation attitudes, by comparing self-reported practices and perceptions of people under two management regimes in northern Pakistan: (a) community-based conservation programme in village Khyber (CBC-only) and (b) co-management of Khunjerab National Park and its buffer zone in village Sost (CBC-NP). Located in the same geographical region, the two sites were demographically and socio-economically comparable. The data were acquired by quantitative (household survey) and qualitative (semi-structured interview) methods, involving adult respondents from 123 randomly selected households in Sost, 104 in Khyber and selected community representatives from both sites, respectively. The data was analysed through descriptive statistics, Chi-squared and t-tests. The results revealed that the communities at both sites were largely aware and appreciative of the conservation programmes. Despite drawing diverse economic benefits from the Khunjerab National Park, the people of CBC-NP showed lesser positive attitudes than those of the CBC-only. The study thus concluded that apart from economic benefits, the local attitudes are largely influenced by a greater sense of participation, ownership and level of engagement in conservation programmes. Since negative attitudes cause conflicts and subsequently failure of PAs, increase community engagement in policies and practices are highly essential for efficient management of PAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Zafar Khan & Sayeed Murad Shah & Athar Ali Khan, 2023. "Assessing conservation attitudes of mountain communities under different resource management regimes in northern Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2550-2570, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02158-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02158-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02158-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02158-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abbot, Joanne I. O. & Thomas, David H. L. & Gardner, Anne A. & Neba, Sama E. & Khen, Mbony W., 2001. "Understanding the Links Between Conservation and Development in the Bamenda Highlands, Cameroon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1115-1136, July.
    2. Kobe De Pourcq & Evert Thomas & Bas Arts & An Vranckx & Tomas Léon-Sicard & Patrick Van Damme, 2015. "Conflict in Protected Areas: Who Says Co-Management Does Not Work?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ezebilo, Eugene E. & Mattsson, Leif, 2010. "Socio-economic benefits of protected areas as perceived by local people around Cross River National Park, Nigeria," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 189-193, March.
    2. Mulugheta G. Araia & Paxie W. Chirwa, 2019. "Revealing the Predominance of Culture over the Ecological Abundance of Resources in Shaping Local People’s Forest and Tree Species Use Behavior: The Case of the Vhavenda People, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Gregory Nguh Muluh & Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi & Ngwa Kester Azibo, 2019. "Challenges and Prospects of Sustaining Donor-Funded Projects in Rural Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Mahanty, Sanghamitra, 2002. "Conservation and Development Interventions as Networks: The Case of the India Ecodevelopment Project, Karnataka," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1369-1386, August.
    5. Tomicevic, Jelena & Shannon, Margaret A. & Milovanovic, Marina, 2010. "Socio-economic impacts on the attitudes towards conservation of natural resources: Case study from Serbia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 157-162, March.
    6. Rumin Zheng & Shuo Zhen & Lin Mei & Hongqiang Jiang, 2021. "Ecotourism Practices in Potatso National Park from the Perspective of Tourists: Assessment and Developing Contradictions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Tai, Hsing-Sheng, 2007. "Development Through Conservation: An Institutional Analysis of Indigenous Community-Based Conservation in Taiwan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1186-1203, July.
    8. Eduardo García-Frapolli & Bárbara Ayala-Orozco & Malena Oliva & Robert J. Smith, 2018. "Different Approaches Towards the Understanding of Socio-Environmental Conflicts in Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Akin L. Mabogunje, 2004. "Framing the Fundamental Issues of Sustainable Development in Sub-Saharan Africa," CID Working Papers 104, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    10. Chabrol, Didier & Mariani, Mariagiulia & Sautier, Denis, 2017. "Establishing Geographical Indications without State Involvement? Learning from Case Studies in Central and West Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 68-81.
    11. Global Environment Facility, 2006. "The Role of Local Benefits in Global Environmental Programs," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7137.
    12. Grosjean, Pauline & Kontoleon, Andreas, 2009. "How Sustainable are Sustainable Development Programs? The Case of the Sloping Land Conversion Program in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 268-285, January.
    13. Cuni-Sanchez, Aida & Ngute, Alain Senghor K. & Sonké, Bonaventure & Sainge, Moses Nsanyi & Burgess, Neil D. & Klein, Julia A. & Marchant, Rob, 2019. "The importance of livelihood strategy and ethnicity in forest ecosystem services’ perceptions by local communities in north-western Cameroon," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    14. Dorothy Ruth Queiros, 2023. "Planning for Socio-Ecological Conservation in South African Nature Reserves: Model of Influences on the Attitudes of Proximate Communities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Soliku, Ophelia & Schraml, Ulrich, 2020. "Protected areas management: A comparison of perceived outcomes associated with different co-management types," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    16. Yi Xie & Yali Wen & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2019. "Application of Ostrom’s Social-Ecological Systems Framework in Nature Reserves: Hybrid Psycho-Economic Model of Collective Forest Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Ariane Amin & Julie G. Zaehringer & Gudrun Schwilch & Inza Koné, 2015. "People, protected areas and ecosystem services: a qualitative and quantitative analysis of local people's perception and preferences in Côte d'Ivoire," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(2), pages 97-109, May.
    18. Wang, Ju-Han Zoe, 2019. "National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 825-833.
    19. Marian Kachniarz, 2024. "Global Gain, but Local Loss—National Park and Municipal Revenues in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02158-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.