IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i3d10.1007_s10668-021-01591-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial differentiation of the impact of transport accessibility on the multidimensional poverty of rural households in karst mountain areas

Author

Listed:
  • Changli Zhu

    (Guizhou Normal University
    The State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province)

  • Zhongfa Zhou

    (Guizhou Normal University
    The State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province)

  • Guoxuan Ma

    (Guizhou Normal University
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control)

  • Linjiang Yin

    (Guizhou Normal University
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control)

Abstract

Transportation facilities are crucial prerequisite for enhancing economic development. In karst mountain areas, poverty of peasant households is multifaceted. Elucidating the characteristics of transportation accessibility and multidimensional poverty of peasant households is a crucial basis for combating poverty. Based on the cost–distance weighting method to evaluate the transport accessibility of farmers in the demonstration area, we constructed a sustainable livelihood framework for farmers in the demonstration area to examine the multidimensional poverty of farmers. Then, we used the geographic weighted regression model to explore the spatial differentiation characteristics of transport accessibility and multidimensional poverty. Farmers with high accessibility were primarily distributed near the village committee residents or on both sides of the road, while farmers with low accessibility were primarily located in areas with large slopes and no access roads or access roads but poor road connectivity. In addition, farmers in the demonstration area were usually short of natural capital, the spatial distribution of material capital poverty was notable, the overall poverty value of financial capital was high, the overall human capital was stable, the poverty value of social capital was markedly different, and high and low values interspersed each villager group. Besides, the multidimensional poverty value of farmers in the demonstration area was low (0.2714), which alternated in space and had no significant law. The poverty dimension of farmers in the demonstration area was 2.8242, demonstrating the spatial comparison of Huajiang town north of Beipanjiang in space. We assessed the impact of accessibility on multidimensional poverty of peasant households. The sample of promoting peasant households was marginally lower than that of restrictive peasant households. Besides, the spatial differentiation was characterized by the promotion of villager groups mostly distributed in Wuli village, Xiagu village, and Bashan village in the northern part of the demonstration area. Moreover, the villager group was primarily distributed in non-karst Mugong villages and Yindongwan village, Taiping village, and Chaeryan village in Fengcong depression. Using the quantitative measurement of transportation accessibility and multidimensional poverty and spatial heterogeneity research, we elucidated the measurement methods of transportation accessibility and multidimensional poverty, as well as their spatial differentiation rules, which have crucial practical significance for the formulation of regional anti-poverty policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Changli Zhu & Zhongfa Zhou & Guoxuan Ma & Linjiang Yin, 2022. "Spatial differentiation of the impact of transport accessibility on the multidimensional poverty of rural households in karst mountain areas," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3863-3883, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01591-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01591-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01591-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01591-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig Leisher & Leah H. Samberg & Pieter Van Buekering & M. Sanjayan, 2013. "Focal Areas for Measuring the Human Well-Being Impacts of a Conservation Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Chenxi Li & Kening Wu, 2017. "Driving forces of the villages hollowing based on geographically weighted regression model: a case study of Longde County, the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(3), pages 1059-1079, December.
    3. Cohen, Alasdair & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2010. "Water and poverty in rural China: Developing an instrument to assess the multiple dimensions of water and poverty," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 999-1009, March.
    4. Michael Epprecht & Daniel Müller & Nicholas Minot, 2011. "How remote are Vietnam’s ethnic minorities? An analysis of spatial patterns of poverty and inequality," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(2), pages 349-368, April.
    5. Sen, Amartya K, 1976. "Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(2), pages 219-231, March.
    6. Mitchell, Paul Mark & Roberts, Tracy E. & Barton, Pelham M. & Coast, Joanna, 2015. "Assessing sufficient capability: A new approach to economic evaluation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 71-79.
    7. Guzman, Luis A. & Oviedo, Daniel, 2018. "Accessibility, affordability and equity: Assessing ‘pro-poor’ public transport subsidies in Bogotá," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 37-51.
    8. Currie, Graham & Richardson, Tony & Smyth, Paul & Vella-Brodrick, Dianne & Hine, Julian & Lucas, Karen & Stanley, Janet & Morris, Jenny & Kinnear, Ray & Stanley, John, 2009. "Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne--Preliminary results," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 97-105, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elzbieta Szymanska & Zofia Koloszko-Chomentowska, 2022. "Sustainable Innovative Mobility Solutions Preferred by Inhabitants of Rural Areas—The Case of Lithuania and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Huiqing Han & Huirong Peng & Song Li & Jianqiang Yang & Zhenggang Yan, 2022. "The Non-Agriculturalization of Cultivated Land in Karst Mountainous Areas in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Huanqi Luo & Yanfei Shu & Zhaoyang Cai, 2023. "Investigating the multidimensional relative poverty in China: Evidence from Nanling Yao ethnic group area," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12357-12370, November.
    4. Na Li & Mang He, 2024. "Feminization of poverty: an analysis of multidimensional poverty among rural women in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anh Thu Quang Pham & Pundarik Mukhopadhaya, 2022. "Multidimensionl Poverty and The Role of Social Capital in Poverty Alleviation Among Ethnic Groups in Rural Vietnam: A Multilevel Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 281-317, January.
    2. Anders Herlitz & David Horan, 2017. "A Model and Indicator of Aggregate Need Satisfaction for Capped Objectives and Weighting Schemes for Situations of Scarcity," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 413-430, September.
    3. Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa, 2020. "Ethnic diversity and transport poverty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 297-309.
    4. Christoph Bader & Sabin Bieri & Urs Wiesmann & Andreas Heinimann, 2016. "Differences Between Monetary and Multidimensional Poverty in the Lao PDR: Implications for Targeting of Poverty Reduction Policies and Interventions," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 171-197, June.
    5. Clarke, Philip & Erreygers, Guido, 2020. "Defining and measuring health poverty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Kinghorn, Philip, 2019. "Using deliberative methods to establish a sufficient state of capability well-being for use in decision-making in the contexts of public health and social care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Chakravarty, Satya R. & Deutsch, Joseph & Silber, Jacques, 2008. "On the Watts Multidimensional Poverty Index and its Decomposition," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1067-1077, June.
    8. Masood Sarwar Awan & Muhammad Amir Aslam, 2011. "Multidimensional Poverty in Pakistan: Case of Punjab Province," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 3(2), pages 133-144.
    9. Oihana Aristondo & Casilda Lasso De La Vega & Ana Urrutia, 2010. "A New Multiplicative Decomposition For The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke Poverty Indices," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 259-267, July.
    10. Espinoza-Delgado, José & Silber, Jacques, 2018. "Multi-dimensional poverty among adults in Central America and gender differences in the three I’s of poverty: Applying inequality sensitive poverty measures with ordinal variables," MPRA Paper 88750, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Borooah, Vani, 2007. "Measuring economic inequality: deprivation, economising and possessing," MPRA Paper 19422, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. N'dri, Lasme Mathieu & Kakinaka, Makoto, 2020. "Financial inclusion, mobile money, and individual welfare: The case of Burkina Faso," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    13. Lane Kenworthy, 2004. "Welfare States, Real Income and Poverty," LIS Working papers 370, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    14. Heindl, Peter & Schuessler, Rudolf, 2015. "Dynamic properties of energy affordability measures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 123-132.
    15. Hendrik Thiel & Stephan L. Thomsen, 2015. "Individual Poverty Paths and the Stability of Control-Perception," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 794, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    16. Belhadj, Besma & Limam, Mohamed, 2012. "Unidimensional and multidimensional fuzzy poverty measures: New approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 995-1002.
    17. repec:pru:wpaper:8 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Francisco J. Ciocchini & Gabriel Molteni, 2008. "Medidas alternativas de la pobreza en el Gran Buenos Aires, 1995-2006," Ensayos de Política Económica, Departamento de Investigación Francisco Valsecchi, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina., vol. 1(2), pages 46-82, Octubre.
    19. Duclos, Jean-Yves & Araar, Abdelkrim & Giles, John, 2010. "Chronic and transient poverty: Measurement and estimation, with evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 266-277, March.
    20. Colin Pooley, 2016. "Mobility, Transport and Social Inclusion: Lessons from History," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 100-109.
    21. Mathias KUEPIE & Eric Patrick FEUBI PAMEN, 2017. "An Application of the Alkire-Foster’s Multidimensional Poverty Index to Data from Madagascar: Taking Into Account the Dimensions of Employment and Gender Inequality," Working Paper 6ca04615-044d-41a0-8737-9, Agence française de développement.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01591-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.