IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i2d10.1007_s10668-021-01529-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Livelihood strategies and use of forest resources in a protected area in the Brazilian semiarid

Author

Listed:
  • Paulo Henrique Santos Gonçalves

    (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
    Universidade Federal de Alagoas)

  • Carlos Vinícius Silveira Melo

    (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco)

  • Clara Andrade

    (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco)

  • Danilo Vicente Batista Oliveira

    (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco)

  • Valdir Brito Junior

    (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco)

  • Kátia F. Rito

    (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México)

  • Patrícia Muniz Medeiros

    (Universidade Federal de Alagoas)

  • Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque

    (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
    Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco)

Abstract

Planning conservation strategies in semiarid regions is challenging since local populations are socially vulnerable and highly dependent on natural resources. Consequently, accessing the factors that develop knowledge and determine the use of forest products could aid in planning conservation actions or rethinking past strategies. We use an environmentally protected area in the Brazilian semiarid to describe the livelihood strategies of the local people and assess how socioeconomic variables affect the dependence on forest resources. We tested whether better conserved areas (with greater vegetation cover) have greater concentrations of useful species for local populations than less protected areas. Our findings demonstrate that families with retired or non-farming members have higher incomes. Additionally, men and elder people have greater knowledge about native medicinal plants, while people with lower household income have greater knowledge of native edible plants. Income and the number of residents in households do not explain the demand for wood forest products. Finally, the conservation levels of forest areas did not affect the number of useful species in the landscape. Local populations have a low socioeconomic dynamism, being highly dependent on natural resources, regardless of local variations in socioeconomic profiles. The variable of vegetation cover may not affect the distribution of useful species since it is only a proxy of total tree density and does not affect species composition. Finally, we recommend that creating fully protected areas in semiarid regions should be remodeled while prioritizing conservation units that allow the reconciliation of forest products’ use and biodiversity conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulo Henrique Santos Gonçalves & Carlos Vinícius Silveira Melo & Clara Andrade & Danilo Vicente Batista Oliveira & Valdir Brito Junior & Kátia F. Rito & Patrícia Muniz Medeiros & Ulysses Paulino Albu, 2022. "Livelihood strategies and use of forest resources in a protected area in the Brazilian semiarid," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2941-2961, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01529-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01529-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01529-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01529-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Saad Moeen & Muhammad Asjad Tariq & Saqib Shahzad & Shehryar Rashid, 2016. "Factors Influencing Choice of Energy Sources in Rural Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 905-920.
    2. Campoli, Jessica Suárez & Alves Júnior, Paulo Nocera & Rossato, Fabrícia Gladys Fernandes da Silva & Rebelatto, Daisy Aparecida do Nascimento, 2020. "The efficiency of Bolsa Familia Program to advance toward the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs): A human development indicator to Brazil," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Ana Maria Bedran-Martins & Maria Carmen Lemos & Arlindo Philippi, 2018. "Relationship between subjective well-being and material quality of life in face of climate vulnerability in NE Brazil," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 283-297, March.
    4. Arabatzis, G. & Malesios, Ch., 2011. "An econometric analysis of residential consumption of fuelwood in a mountainous prefecture of Northern Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 8088-8097.
    5. Bedran-Martins, Ana Maria & Lemos, Maria Carmen, 2017. "Politics of drought under Bolsa Família program in Northeast Brazil," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7, pages 15-21.
    6. Vedeld, Paul & Angelsen, Arild & Bojo, Jan & Sjaastad, Espen & Kobugabe Berg, Gertrude, 2007. "Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(7), pages 869-879, April.
    7. Bird, Kate & Shepherd, Andrew, 2003. "Livelihoods and Chronic Poverty in Semi-Arid Zimbabwe," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 591-610, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bello-Bravo, Julia, 2020. "Managing biodiversity & divinities: Case study of one twenty-year humanitarian forest restoration project in Benin," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Chloé Duvivier Duvivier & Mary-Françoise Renard & Shi Li, 2012. "Are workers close to cities paid higher non-agricultural wages in rural China?," CERDI Working papers halshs-00673698, HAL.
    3. Soltani, Arezoo & Angelsen, Arild & Eid, Tron & Naieni, Mohammad Saeid Noori & Shamekhi, Taghi, 2012. "Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 60-70.
    4. Mugido, Worship & Shackleton, Charlie M., 2019. "The contribution of NTFPS to rural livelihoods in different agro-ecological zones of South Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho & António José Dinis Ferreira, 2020. "Forest Resources Management and Sustainability: The Specific Case of European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Meyer, Maximilian & Hulke, Carolin & Kamwi, Jonathan & Kolem, Hannah & Börner, Jan, 2022. "Spatially heterogeneous effects of collective action on environmental dependence in Namibia’s Zambezi region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Porro, Roberto & Lopez-Feldman, Alejandro & Vela-Alvarado, Jorge W., 2015. "Forest use and agriculture in Ucayali, Peru: Livelihood strategies, poverty and wealth in an Amazon frontier," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 47-56.
    8. Wang, Chengchao & Yang, Yusheng & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2012. "Rural household livelihood change, fuelwood substitution, and hilly ecosystem restoration: Evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2475-2482.
    9. Yuting Sun & Shu-Nung Yao, 2022. "Sustainability Trade-Offs in Media Coverage of Poverty Alleviation: A Content-Based Spatiotemporal Analysis in China’s Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    10. Felkner, John S. & Lee, Hyun & Shaikh, Sabina & Kolata, Alan & Binford, Michael, 2022. "The interrelated impacts of credit access, market access and forest proximity on livelihood strategies in Cambodia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Stelian Paris & Rodica Sîrbu & Emin Cadar & Aneta Tomescu & Cristina Luiza Erimia, 2019. "The Patient - The Most Important Point of Medical System," European Journal of Medicine and Natural Scinces Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, ejmn_v2_i.
    12. Shyamsundar, Priya & Ahlroth, Sofia & Kristjanson, Patricia & Onder, Stefanie, 2020. "Supporting pathways to prosperity in forest landscapes – A PRIME framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Bierkamp, Sina & Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Grote, Ulrike, 2021. "Environmental income and remittances: Evidence from rural central highlands of Vietnam," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Petridis, Konstantinos & Galatsidas, Spyros & Ioannou, Konstantinos, 2013. "A demand scenario based fuelwood supply chain: A conceptual model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 687-697.
    15. C. Duvivier & S. Li & M.-F. Renard, 2013. "Are workers close to cities paid higher nonagricultural wages in rural China?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(30), pages 4308-4322, October.
    16. López-Feldman, Alejandro, 2014. "Shocks, Income and Wealth: Do They Affect the Extraction of Natural Resources by Rural Households?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 91-100.
    17. Shuanglei Zhou & Shaojun Chen, 2023. "The Impact of the Anti-Poverty Relocation and Settlement Program on Farmers’ Livelihood: Perspective of Livelihood Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Rayamajhi, Santosh & Smith-Hall, Carsten & Helles, Finn, 2012. "Empirical evidence of the economic importance of Central Himalayan forests to rural households," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 25-35.
    19. Baumgartner, Philipp & von Braun, Joachim & Abebaw, Degnet & Müller, Marc, 2015. "Impacts of Large-scale Land Investments on Income, Prices, and Employment: Empirical Analyses in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 175-190.
    20. Yang, Aoxi & Wang, Yahui, 2023. "Transition of household cooking energy in China since the 1980s," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01529-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.