IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v21y2019i3d10.1007_s10668-018-0082-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land use of the environmental protected area of the coastal environment of Serra do Tabuleiro State Park-Palhoça/SC, Brazil: zoning and environmental restrictions

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Medeiros Machado

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC)

  • Cátia Regina Silva Carvalho Pinto

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
    Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC)

  • Roberth Andrés Villazón Montalván

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC)

  • Tadeu Maia Nogueira Portela

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC)

  • Renata Martins Pacheco

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC)

  • Renê Lebarbenchon Macêdo

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC)

Abstract

The creation of National Parks challenges institutions, technicians and actors involved in the processes of management and protection of natural resources, due to numerous conflicts experienced by local population. The extensiveness of nine municipalities in the Serra do Tabuleiro State Park (PEST—acronym in portuguese) within the limits of the Park, along with the development of cities, displays many interests and land conflicts in the Park. This situation forced, in 2009, governmental parties to establish a new demarcation process, aiming the removal of conflict areas and creation of new categories of protected areas. In this context, this paper aims to report the PEST history, collecting environmental characteristics and land use owned by the environmental protection area of surrounding coastal of the Serra do Tabuleiro State Park, in the northeastern portion of the Baixada Massiambu, the locations of the Pinheira and Guarda do Embaú beaches, in city of Palhoça/SC, Brazil. On this regard, a literature research was performed, referring to the uses of the area under study, as well as the legal and territory definitions; then, field visits were performed from March 2012 to March 2014, and finally, data collected were aggregated using geographic information systems, along with data regarding the ecological and legal characteristics of the area. Results displayed 6501 plots of land on the Pinheira and Guarda do Embaú beaches, and of these, 77% had no environmental restrictions, 13% had partial restrictions, and 10% presented total restrictions. Thus, the PEST delimitation demonstrated great ecological significance for human settlement, especially in some detached areas, which should be kept and preserved. This work makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of the Baixada Massiambu problem, mainly related to land use; protective measures and environmental recovery can be formulated in this region, taking into consideration aspects such as environmental planning and mechanisms of reorganization discussion for this territory.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Medeiros Machado & Cátia Regina Silva Carvalho Pinto & Roberth Andrés Villazón Montalván & Tadeu Maia Nogueira Portela & Renata Martins Pacheco & Renê Lebarbenchon Macêdo, 2019. "Land use of the environmental protected area of the coastal environment of Serra do Tabuleiro State Park-Palhoça/SC, Brazil: zoning and environmental restrictions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1225-1250, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:21:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-018-0082-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-018-0082-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-018-0082-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-018-0082-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aretano, Roberta & Semeraro, Teodoro & Petrosillo, Irene & De Marco, Antonella & Pasimeni, Maria Rita & Zurlini, Giovanni, 2015. "Mapping ecological vulnerability to fire for effective conservation management of natural protected areas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 163-175.
    2. Costanza, Robert & Fisher, Brendan & Mulder, Kenneth & Liu, Shuang & Christopher, Treg, 2007. "Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 478-491, March.
    3. Foley, Melissa M. & Halpern, Benjamin S. & Micheli, Fiorenza & Armsby, Matthew H. & Caldwell, Margaret R. & Crain, Caitlin M. & Prahler, Erin & Rohr, Nicole & Sivas, Deborah & Beck, Michael W. & Carr,, 2010. "Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 955-966, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariane Paulina Batalha Roque & José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto & André Luiz Lopes Faria, 2022. "Degraded grassland and the conflict of land use in protected areas of hotspot in Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1475-1492, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malone, Thomas C. & DiGiacomo, Paul M. & Gonçalves, Emanuel & Knap, Anthony H. & Talaue-McManus, Liana & de Mora, Stephen, 2014. "A global ocean observing system framework for sustainable development," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 262-272.
    2. Thomas C. Malone & Paul M. DiGiacomo & Emanuel Gonçalves & Anthony H. Knap & Liana Talaue‐McManus & Stephen de Mora & Jose Muelbert, 2014. "Enhancing the Global Ocean Observing System to meet evidence based needs for the ecosystem‐based management of coastal ecosystem services," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(3), pages 168-181, August.
    3. Townsend, Michael & Thrush, Simon F. & Lohrer, Andrew M. & Hewitt, Judi E. & Lundquist, Carolyn J. & Carbines, Megan & Felsing, Malene, 2014. "Overcoming the challenges of data scarcity in mapping marine ecosystem service potential," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 44-55.
    4. Nunes, Paulo A.L.D. & Ojea, Elena & Loureiro, Maria L., 2009. "Mapping of Forest Biodiversity Values: A Plural Perspective," Sustainable Development Papers 47768, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    5. Yu, Dan & Xie, Ping & Dong, Xiaohua & Su, Bob & Hu, Xiaonong & Wang, Kai & Xu, Shijin, 2018. "The development of land use planning scenarios based on land suitability and its influences on eco-hydrological responses in the upstream of the Huaihe River basin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 373(C), pages 53-67.
    6. Roux, Nicolas & Kastner, Thomas & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Haberl, Helmut, 2021. "Does agricultural trade reduce pressure on land ecosystems? Decomposing drivers of the embodied human appropriation of net primary production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Chakraborty, Shamik & Gasparatos, Alexandros & Blasiak, Robert, 2020. "Multiple values for the management and sustainable use of coastal and marine ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    8. Alena J. Raymond & James R. Tipton & Alissa Kendall & Jason T. DeJong, 2020. "Review of impact categories and environmental indicators for life cycle assessment of geotechnical systems," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 485-499, June.
    9. Halkos, George, 2012. "Assessing the economic value of protecting artificial lakes," MPRA Paper 39557, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Tessa Mazor & Hugh P Possingham & Dori Edelist & Eran Brokovich & Salit Kark, 2014. "The Crowded Sea: Incorporating Multiple Marine Activities in Conservation Plans Can Significantly Alter Spatial Priorities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Lai, Sabrina & Leone, Federica, 2020. "To what extent is integration pursued in compulsory planning tools concerning coastal and marine areas? Evidences from two Mediterranean protected areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Elena Ojea & Paulo Nunes & Maria Loureiro, 2010. "Mapping Biodiversity Indicators and Assessing Biodiversity Values in Global Forests," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 47(3), pages 329-347, November.
    13. Liwei Zhang & Yihe Lü & Bojie Fu & Yuan Zeng, 2017. "Uncertainties of Two Methods in Selecting Priority Areas for Protecting Soil Conservation Service at Regional Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-12, September.
    14. Ding, Helen & Nunes, Paulo A.L.D., 2014. "Modeling the links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human wellbeing in the context of climate change: Results from an econometric analysis of the European forest ecosystems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 60-73.
    15. Xiao Zhang & Jun Wang & Mingyue Zhao & Yan Gao & Yanxu Liu, 2023. "Variations of Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand on the Southeast Hilly Area of China: Implications for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Katikiro, Robert E. & Macusi, Edison D. & Ashoka Deepananda, K.H.M., 2015. "Challenges facing local communities in Tanzania in realising locally-managed marine areas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 220-229.
    17. Klain, Sarah C. & Chan, Kai M.A., 2012. "Navigating coastal values: Participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 104-113.
    18. Shucksmith, Rachel J. & Kelly, Christina, 2014. "Data collection and mapping – Principles, processes and application in marine spatial planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 27-33.
    19. Federica Epifani & Donatella Valente, 2023. "Sustainable Governance of Tourism-Based Social–Ecological Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Xiaolu Huang & Jishun Yan & Guangshuai Zhang & Jie Huang & Quanming Wang & Binyong Li & Yu Ma, 2023. "Marine Ecological Function Zoning and Management Countermeasures: A Case Study of the Sea Area of Zhejiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:21:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-018-0082-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.