IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v25y2025i2d10.1007_s10660-023-09717-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value implication of sellers’ following in social marketplaces: A structural holes perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Shan Wang

    (University of Saskatchewan)

  • Fang Wang

    (Wilfrid Laurier University)

Abstract

Sellers in social marketplaces actively engage in following behaviors. However, extant research has repeatedly reported a negative effect of the followee number on seller performance, raising questions about sellers’ value in following others. Intrigued by this question, this study applies the theory of structural holes to understand and explain sellers’ value in following. That is, sellers whose followee networks span more structural holes are better positioned to gain social capital and thus achieve better performance. An empirical study of panel data with 1023 Etsy sellers and their followee networks involving 156,176 alters per month supports this explanation—the structural holes in, instead of the size of, sellers’ followee networks have a significant, positive effect on their sales performance. The study further reveals that such effects are stronger for sellers with higher product diversification, more prominent followees, and lower followee status heterophily.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan Wang & Fang Wang, 2025. "The value implication of sellers’ following in social marketplaces: A structural holes perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1145-1171, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10660-023-09717-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-023-09717-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-023-09717-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-023-09717-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10660-023-09717-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.