IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v25y2025i2d10.1007_s10660-023-09679-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To trust or not to trust: a qualitative study of older adults’ online communication during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Xusen Cheng

    (Renmin University of China)

  • Liyang Qiao

    (Renmin University of China)

  • Bo Yang

    (Renmin University of China)

  • Ruixue Han

    (Zhengzhou University)

Abstract

Online communication is an effective solution to the social isolation of older adults that can result from attempts to avoid COVID-19 transmission, but they may not be familiar with virtual identities in online communication and struggle to develop trusting relationships. We address this dilemma in this study by using qualitative methods including semi-structured interviews. We employ the social exchange theory and trust transfer theory to develop a conceptual model from three perspectives: the characteristics of the trustor, those of the trustee, and their shared factors. We find that trust is moderated by social isolation and health concerns experienced by older adults during the pandemic and that outcomes associated with trust building include satisfaction, reliance, and loyalty. The findings enrich our understanding of the mental health of older adults and online interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic, and can be extended to similar contexts in which long-term isolation is necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Xusen Cheng & Liyang Qiao & Bo Yang & Ruixue Han, 2025. "To trust or not to trust: a qualitative study of older adults’ online communication during the COVID-19 pandemic," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 849-878, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10660-023-09679-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-023-09679-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-023-09679-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-023-09679-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10660-023-09679-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.