IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v23y2023i4d10.1007_s10660-022-09560-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Fine-tuned BERT Model in Classification of Helpful and Unhelpful Online Customer Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Bilal

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

  • Abdulwahab Ali Almazroi

    (University of Jeddah)

Abstract

The problem of information overload in online review platforms has seriously hampered many customers’ ability to evaluate the quality of products or businesses when making purchasing decisions. A large body of literature exists that attempts to predict the helpfulness of online customer reviews and has reported contradictory findings on the effectiveness of various approaches. Moreover, many existing solutions use traditional machine learning techniques and handcrafted features, limiting generalization. Therefore, this study aims to propose a generalized approach by fine-tuning the BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) base model. The performance of BERT-based classifiers is then compared with that of bag-of-words approaches to determine the effectiveness of BERT-based classifiers. The evaluations performed using Yelp shopping reviews show that fine-tuned BERT-based classifiers outperform bag-of-words approaches in classifying helpful and unhelpful reviews. In addition, it is found that the sequence length of the BERT-based classifier has a significant impact on classification performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Bilal & Abdulwahab Ali Almazroi, 2023. "Effectiveness of Fine-tuned BERT Model in Classification of Helpful and Unhelpful Online Customer Reviews," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2737-2757, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:23:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-022-09560-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-022-09560-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-022-09560-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-022-09560-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:23:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-022-09560-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.