IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v23y2023i4d10.1007_s10660-021-09526-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on the role of uninterested items in group recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Chintoo Kumar

    (Indian Institute of Technology (BHU))

  • C. Ravindranath Chowdary

    (Indian Institute of Technology (BHU))

Abstract

With the increase in the availability of network connectivity, e-commerce has grown rapidly. User products and reviews have grown multi-folds for these online markets, leading to the web’s data explosion. A recommender system overcomes this problem and provides personalised content to the user by mining a plethora of choices available on the web. In the group recommendations scenario, group members will have different tastes and achieving consensus is a nontrivial task. The common set of items taken from users’ preferences is vital to provide recommendations. In practice, recommendations are generated by considering only common interest items, with the remaining items not playing a role in the recommendation. The items that are not of interest to a user based on her implicit or explicit feedback are called uninterested items. We hypothesise that these uninterested items may influence the overall recommendations, which can help us better interpret users’ preferences. In this work, we also include the importance of uninterested items of the group members while generating the recommendation list. We have performed experiments over automatically identified groups and random groups to check the efficacy of the proposed models. We conducted experiments on publicly available real-world datasets. We found that incorporating uninterested item in group recommendations play a positive role in group recommendations while considering order and flexibility in user preferences. We observed that the overall group satisfaction scores are better in an automatically identified group.

Suggested Citation

  • Chintoo Kumar & C. Ravindranath Chowdary, 2023. "A study on the role of uninterested items in group recommendations," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2073-2099, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:23:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-021-09526-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-021-09526-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-021-09526-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-021-09526-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:23:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-021-09526-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.