IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eaiere/v21y2024i2d10.1007_s40844-024-00285-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralization and rural–urban income inequality: implications for inverted-U hypothesis of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Shahid

    (Government Islamia Graduate College Civil Lines)

  • Khalil Ahmad

    (Government Islamia Graduate College Civil Lines)

  • Ayesha Haider

    (National College of Business Administration and Economics (NCBA&E))

  • Safdar Ali

    (Government Islamia Graduate College Civil Lines)

Abstract

The decentralization process greatly improves a society's welfare by offering public goods and services. Inequality between rural and urban areas as well as the overall effects of decentralization is examined in this study in Pakistan. In addition, the rural–urban inverted-U hypothesis is investigated for a country-specific focus on Pakistan using a time-series data set spanning the years 1985 to 2020. Using the auto-regressive distributive lag model (ARDL) bounds testing co-integration method, variables are evaluated over the long run and their error correction dynamic is applied to short-run instants of the variables. The study's findings successfully demonstrate the opposite of what is typically found for the implications of rural inequality owing to fiscal decentralization, namely that fiscal decentralization has exacerbated the overall inequality situation in rural and urban Pakistan. Decentralization in politics and administration is more beneficial for enhancing the overall and urban income distribution in Pakistan. Decentralization has, however, affected rural regions' income distribution in both directions. Furthermore, for both the national economy and urban regions, the GDP per capita growth rate and its square support Kuznet's inverted U-shape theory. However, the distribution of income in Pakistan's rural areas does not support this theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Shahid & Khalil Ahmad & Ayesha Haider & Safdar Ali, 2024. "Decentralization and rural–urban income inequality: implications for inverted-U hypothesis of Pakistan," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 177-197, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eaiere:v:21:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s40844-024-00285-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40844-024-00285-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40844-024-00285-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40844-024-00285-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fiscal decentralization; Political decentralization; Administrative decentralization; Rural–urban income inequality; Level of economic development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • E02 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Institutions and the Macroeconomy
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eaiere:v:21:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s40844-024-00285-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.