IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v48y2025i3d10.1007_s40264-024-01491-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Signals of Possibly Persistent Gustatory, Olfactory and Auditory Adverse Drug Reactions to Antibiotic Drugs: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the EudraVigilance Database

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Ferraro

    (University of Pisa)

  • Emiliano Cappello

    (University of Pisa)

  • Marco Fornili

    (University of Pisa)

  • Irma Convertino

    (University of Pisa)

  • Marco Bonaso

    (University of Pisa)

  • Ersilia Lucenteforte

    (Applications “G. Parenti”, University of Florence)

  • Marco Tuccori

    (University of Verona)

Abstract

Background In 2018, the European Medicines Agency issued some risk minimisation measures related to unresolved adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported for fluoroquinolones, including sensory ADRs. Spontaneous reporting databases frequently report unresolved outcomes for gustatory, olfactory and auditory (GOA) ADRs. However, such a high volume of unresolved GOA ADRs could reflect an under-investigated clinical issue or an intrinsic difficulty in the outcome assessment. Objectives The objectives of the study were: (1) to investigate whether unresolved outcomes are reported more frequently for GOA ADRs than for other ADRs to systemic antibiotics and (2) to identify possible signals of unresolved GOA ADRs for systemic antibiotics. Methods We used the EudraVigilance database to extract the number of ADRs to systemic antibiotics of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical class J01 up to February 2019. We classified ADRs in “non-GOA ADRs” and “GOA ADRs”. Adverse drug reactions were categorised in three groups according to the outcome: defined, persistent/permanent (unresolved) and undetermined ADRs. We performed disproportionality analyses with the case/non-case methodology, by calculating the crude reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Cases were all persistent/permanent ADRs, and non-cases were defined and undetermined ADRs. For the first objective, index groups were gustatory or olfactory or auditory ADRs, while reference group included all non-GOA ADRs. For the second objective, we performed a disproportionality analysis by using the sub-set of GOA ADRs. Index and reference groups varied with subgroups of drugs and drug class, so that each drug and drug class was compared with the others. We conducted two sensitivity analyses for each analysis by varying the case definition. Results We extracted 748,798 ADRs, including 10,770 GOA ADRs. The first analysis showed that GOA ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved events compared with all other ADRs (ROR: 2.68 95% CI 2.51–2.85; ROR: 5.20 95% CI 4.66–5.81; and ROR: 2.64 (95% CI 2.51–2.79, respectively). Gustatory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.18–2.41, p = 0.0038), azithromycin (ROR: 2.07, 95% CI 1.58–2.72, p

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Ferraro & Emiliano Cappello & Marco Fornili & Irma Convertino & Marco Bonaso & Ersilia Lucenteforte & Marco Tuccori, 2025. "Signals of Possibly Persistent Gustatory, Olfactory and Auditory Adverse Drug Reactions to Antibiotic Drugs: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the EudraVigilance Database," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 217-231, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:48:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01491-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01491-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-024-01491-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-024-01491-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:48:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01491-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.