IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v48y2025i1d10.1007_s40264-024-01481-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pharmacovigilance in the Age of Legalized Cannabis: Using Social Media to Monitor Drug–Drug Interactions Between Immunosuppressants and Cannabis-Derived Products

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew R. Allen

    (University of California San Diego
    Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego)

  • Gwenyth Portillo Wightman

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Zechariah Zhu

    (Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego
    Qualcomm Institute, University of California San Diego)

  • Adam Poliak

    (Bryn Mawr College)

  • Davey M. Smith

    (Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego)

  • Mark Dredze

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • John W. Ayers

    (Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego
    Qualcomm Institute, University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego)

Abstract

Introduction A clinical trial of Epidiolex®, the only US FDA-approved cannabis-derived consumer product (CDP), discovered an interaction with an immunosuppressant (tacrolimus) that led to drug toxicity, highlighting the unique intersection of prescription and commonly unregulated consumer products. Objective We aimed to identify if similar drug–drug interactions (DDIs) are occurring among the consumer CDP market, even though they cannot be identified through trials. Methods We searched Reddit for subreddits related to CDPs or health, resulting in 63,561,233 posts. From these, we identified 190 posts discussing both immunosuppressants and CDPs. Two blinded investigators evaluated the following. (1) Was there a concern about a potential DDI between consumer CDPs and immunosuppressants? (2) Was there a unique adverse event attributed to a DDI between consumer CDPs and immunosuppressants? Results Of these, 66 posts (35%) expressed concern about a potential DDI, such as “Hey, my partner wants to try my edibles … she’s on Prograf [tacrolimus] and wants to talk to a stoner who’s had a heart transplant.” Four posts (2%) reported a unique DDI, such as “I have clinical results that are semi-anecdotal, showing the coordination to my halting substance use … It's the CBD. Shot my prograf to 30 at like 4 mg.” Two of the four reported DDIs are similar to those first reported for Epidiolex. The remaining two reported DDIs include a potential cannabidiol (CBD)/sirolimus or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)/sirolimus interaction and a THC/tacrolimus interaction, both resulting in drug toxicity. Conclusion This case study is the first to report on DDIs involving consumer CDPs, including both CBD and THC products, as well as a broader class of immunosuppressants. This demonstrates the risks associated with using consumer CDPs alongside prescription medications while highlighting the need for development of increased surveillance to monitor consumer CDPs for drug safety signals, as well as comprehensive regulations that take into account the unique characteristics of the consumer marketplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew R. Allen & Gwenyth Portillo Wightman & Zechariah Zhu & Adam Poliak & Davey M. Smith & Mark Dredze & John W. Ayers, 2025. "Pharmacovigilance in the Age of Legalized Cannabis: Using Social Media to Monitor Drug–Drug Interactions Between Immunosuppressants and Cannabis-Derived Products," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 99-105, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:48:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01481-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01481-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-024-01481-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-024-01481-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:48:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01481-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.