IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v47y2024i9d10.1007_s40264-024-01443-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in Use and Evidence of Adherence to Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Pregnancy Testing Requirements for Thalidomide, Lenalidomide, and Pomalidomide in the USA, 2000–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Mufaddal Mahesri

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Ameet Sarpatwari

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School
    Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law)

  • Krista F. Huybrechts

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Joyce Lii

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Su Been Lee

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Gita A. Toyserkani

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration)

  • Cynthia LaCivita

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration)

  • Esther H. Zhou

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration)

  • Gerald J. Dal Pan

    (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration)

  • Aaron S. Kesselheim

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School
    Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law)

  • Katsiaryna Bykov

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

Abstract

Introduction Lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and thalidomide are effective treatments for multiple myeloma but are teratogenic. To mitigate this risk, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs for these drugs, which include pregnancy testing among women of childbearing potential—twice before initiation, weekly in the first month on treatment, and every 2–4 weeks thereafter. Objective We evaluated dispensing trends of lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and thalidomide and assessed adherence to REMS pregnancy testing requirements among at-risk patients taking these drugs. Methods Using three US health insurance claims databases (Optum Clinformatics® [2004–2020], Merative Marketscan [2003–2019], and Medicaid [2000–2018]), we assessed monthly use of the drugs, patient characteristics and treatment persistence among drug initiators, and claims-based evidence for adherence to pregnancy testing requirements among initiators with child-bearing potential. Results Lenalidomide was the most prescribed agent following its approval in 2006 and through the end of the study period. A total of 48,311 lenalidomide (mean age = 59 years [standard deviation (SD) = 16]), 17,550 thalidomide (mean age = 65 years [SD = 12]), and 6560 pomalidomide initiators (mean age = 65 years [SD = 11]) were identified; 45% of initiators of each drug were women. Among initiators under follow-up on day 90, 70% were still on therapy. Initiators of childbearing potential comprised 3% (N = 1,920) of all initiators; among this cohort, 12% had evidence in claims data of two pregnancy tests before initiation, and 9% with at least 33 days of follow-up of four tests during the first month of treatment. By contrast, 52% who received a refill had claims-based evidence of a pregnancy test within 7 days of dispensing. Conclusion Although most patients who initiated lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and thalidomide were not of child-bearing potential, further investigation into actual non-adherence to pregnancy testing is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mufaddal Mahesri & Ameet Sarpatwari & Krista F. Huybrechts & Joyce Lii & Su Been Lee & Gita A. Toyserkani & Cynthia LaCivita & Esther H. Zhou & Gerald J. Dal Pan & Aaron S. Kesselheim & Katsiaryna Byk, 2024. "Trends in Use and Evidence of Adherence to Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Pregnancy Testing Requirements for Thalidomide, Lenalidomide, and Pomalidomide in the USA, 2000–2020," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(9), pages 909-919, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01443-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01443-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-024-01443-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-024-01443-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ameet Sarpatwari & Mayookha Mitra-Majumdar & Katsiaryna Bykov & Jerry Avorn & Steven Woloshin & Gita A. Toyserkani & Cynthia LaCivita & Claudia Manzo & Esther H. Zhou & Ellen Pinnow & Gerald J. Dal Pa, 2021. "A Multi-modal Approach to Evaluate the Impact of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Programs," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(7), pages 743-751, July.
    2. Nancy A. Brandenburg & Robert Bwire & John Freeman & Florence Houn & Paul Sheehan & Jerome B. Zeldis, 2017. "Effectiveness of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) for Lenalidomide and Thalidomide: Patient Comprehension and Knowledge Retention," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 333-341, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea M. Russell & Elaine H. Morrato & Rebecca M. Lovett & Meredith Y. Smith, 2020. "Quality of Reporting on the Evaluation of Risk Minimization Programs: A Systematic Review," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 427-446, May.
    2. Soraya Machado de Jesus & Rafael Santos Santana & Silvana Nair Leite, 2020. "The organization, weaknesses, and challenges of the control of thalidomide in Brazil: A review," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01443-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.