Author
Listed:
- Rachel L. Wasserman
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital
MCPHS University)
- Diane L. Seger
(Mass General Brigham)
- Mary G. Amato
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital)
- Andrew Y. Hwang
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital
MCPHS University)
- Julie Fiskio
(Mass General Brigham)
- David W. Bates
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Mass General Brigham
Harvard Medical School)
Abstract
Introduction A risk factor for a potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmia Torsade de Pointes is a prolongation in the heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) ≥ 500 milliseconds (ms) or an increase of ≥ 60 ms from a patient’s baseline value, which can cause sudden cardiac death. The Tisdale risk score calculator uses clinical variables to predict which hospitalized patients are at the highest risk for QTc prolongation. Objective To determine the rate of overridden QTc drug–drug interaction (DDI)-related clinical decision support (CDS) alerts per patient admission and the prevalence by Tisdale risk score category of these overridden alerts. Secondary outcome was to determine the rate of drug-induced QTc prolongation (diQTP) associated with overrides. Methods Our organization’s enterprise data warehouse was used to retrospectively access QTc DDI alerts presented for patients aged ≥ 18 years who were admitted to Brigham and Women’s Hospital during 2022. The QTc DDI CDS alerts were included if shown to a physician, fellow, resident, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner when entering the order in inpatient areas for patients with a length of stay of at least 2 days. Variables collected for the Tisdale calculator included age, sex, whether patient was on a loop diuretic, potassium level, admission QTc value, admitting diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, sepsis, or heart failure, and number of QTc-prolonging drugs given to the patient. Results A total of 2649 patients with 3033 patient admissions had 18,432 QTc DDI alerts presented that were overridden. An average of 3 unique QTc DDI alerts were presented per patient admission and the alerts were overridden an average of 6 times per patient admission. Overall, 6% of patient admissions were low risk (score ≤ 6), 64% moderate risk (score 7–10), and 30% high risk (score ≥ 11) of QTc prolongation. The most common QTc DDI alerts overridden resulting in an diQTP were quetiapine and propofol (11%) and amiodarone and haloperidol (7%). The diQTP occurred in 883 of patient admissions (29%) and was more frequent in those with higher risk score, with 46% of patient admissions with diQTP in high risk, 23% in moderate risk, and 8% in low risk. Conclusion Use of the Tisdale calculator to assess patient-specific risk of QT prolongation combined with CDS may improve overall alert quality and acceptance rate, which may decrease the diQTP rate.
Suggested Citation
Rachel L. Wasserman & Diane L. Seger & Mary G. Amato & Andrew Y. Hwang & Julie Fiskio & David W. Bates, 2024.
"A Calculated Risk: Evaluation of QTc Drug–Drug Interaction (DDI) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Alerts and Performance of the Tisdale Risk Score Calculator,"
Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(12), pages 1235-1243, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01466-w
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01466-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01466-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.