Author
Listed:
- Chiara Bellitto
(University of Verona)
- Nicoletta Luxi
(University of Verona)
- Francesco Ciccimarra
(University of Verona)
- Luca L’Abbate
(University of Messina)
- Monika Raethke
(University of Utrecht)
- Florence Hunsel
(University of Utrecht
University of Groningen)
- Thomas Lieber
(University of Utrecht)
- Erik Mulder
(University of Utrecht)
- Fabio Riefolo
(Barcelona Health Hub)
- Felipe Villalobos
(Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol))
- Nicolas H. Thurin
(Univ. Bordeaux)
- Francisco B. Marques
(University of Coimbra)
- Kathryn Morton
(Drug Safety Research Unit
University of Portsmouth)
- Fergal O’Shaughnessy
(RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences)
- Simona Sonderlichová
(Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice)
- Andreea Farcas
(Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy)
- Giele-Eshuis Janneke
(University Medical Centre Utrecht)
- Miriam C. Sturkenboom
(University Medical Centre Utrecht)
- Gianluca Trifirò
(University of Verona)
Abstract
Background The safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients has not been comprehensively evaluated. Aim To measure the frequency of patient-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to the first/second/booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine in immunocompromised subject versus matched cohort. As a secondary objective, the time course, evaluated as time to onset (TTO) and time to recovery (TTR), of COVID-19 vaccine-related ADRs was explored. Methods A prospective cohort study, based on electronic questionnaires filled by vaccinees from 11 European countries in the period February 2021 to February 2023 was conducted. All immunocompromised vaccinees who provided informed consent and registered to the project’s web-app within 48 h after first/booster vaccine dose administration of any EMA-authorised COVID-19 vaccine were recruited. Participants filled baseline and up to six follow-up questionnaires (FU-Qs) over 6 months from vaccination, collecting information on suspected COVID-19 vaccine-related ADRs. As a control group, non-immunocompromised vaccinees from the same source population were 1:4 matched by sex, age, vaccine dose, and brand. A descriptive analysis of demographic/clinical characteristics of vaccinees was conducted. Heatmaps of the frequency of solicited ADRs, stratified by gender and vaccine brand, were generated. Median TTO/TTR of reported ADRs were visualised using violin/box-plots. Results A total of 773 immunocompromised vaccines were included in the analyses. Most participants were females (F/M ratio: 2.1 and 1.6) with a median age of 56 (43–74) and 51 (41–60) years, at the first vaccination cycle and booster dose, respectively. Injection-site pain and fatigue were the most frequently reported ADRs in immunocompromised vaccinees with higher frequency than matched control, especially after the first dose (41.2% vs 37.8% and 38.2% vs 32.9%, respectively). For both cohorts, all solicited ADRs were more frequently reported in females than males, and in those who had received a first dose of the Vaxzevria vaccine. Dizziness was the most frequently reported unsolicited ADR after the first dose in both groups (immunocompromised subjects: 2.5% and matched controls: 2.1%). At the booster dose, lymphadenopathy (3.9%) and lymphadenitis (1.8%) were the most reported unsolicited ADRs for immunocompromised subjects and matched controls, respectively. A very low number of subjects reported adverse event of special interest (AESI) (2 immunocompromised, 3 matched controls) and serious ADRs (5 immunocompromised, 5 matched controls). A statistically significant difference among study cohorts was observed for median TTO after the booster dose, and for median TTR after the first vaccination cycle and booster dose (p
Suggested Citation
Chiara Bellitto & Nicoletta Luxi & Francesco Ciccimarra & Luca L’Abbate & Monika Raethke & Florence Hunsel & Thomas Lieber & Erik Mulder & Fabio Riefolo & Felipe Villalobos & Nicolas H. Thurin & Franc, 2024.
"What is the Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Immunocompromised Patients? Results from the European “Covid Vaccine Monitor” Active Surveillance Study,"
Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 47(10), pages 1011-1023, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01449-x
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01449-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:47:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-024-01449-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.