IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v44y2021i3d10.1007_s40264-020-01021-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Neurocognitive Adverse Drug Reactions: Analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports from the Eudravigilance Database

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriella di Mauro

    (University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
    Campania Region)

  • Alessia Zinzi

    (University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
    Campania Region)

  • Cristina Scavone

    (University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
    Campania Region)

  • Annamaria Mascolo

    (University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
    Campania Region)

  • Mario Gaio

    (University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
    Campania Region)

  • Liberata Sportiello

    (University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
    Campania Region)

  • Carmen Ferrajolo

    (University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
    Campania Region)

  • Concetta Rafaniello

    (University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
    Campania Region)

  • Francesco Rossi

    (University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
    Campania Region)

  • Annalisa Capuano

    (University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
    Campania Region)

Abstract

Introduction Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9Is) were associated with a risk of neurocognitive adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Objective We aimed to investigate the occurrence of neuropsychiatric ADRs related to PCSK9Is. Methods We analyzed Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) sent through the European pharmacovigilance database that reported alirocumab or evolocumab as the suspected drug and at least one neurological or psychiatric ADR. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was computed to compare the probability of reporting ICSRs with neuropsychiatric ADRs between alirocumab, evolocumab and statins. Results Overall, 2041 ICSRs with alirocumab and/or evolocumab as the suspected drug described the occurrence of neuropsychiatric ADRs. The most reported preferred terms for both drugs were headache, insomnia and depression. No difference between alirocumab and evolocumab was observed for the RORs of ICSRs with ADRs belonging to the System Organ Classes (SOCs) ‘Nervous system disorders’ or ‘Psychiatric disorders’ (ROR 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.91–1.14; and 1.12, 95% CI 0.94–1.34, respectively), while evolocumab and alirocumab had a higher reporting probability of ICSRs with ADRs belonging to the SOC ‘Nervous system disorders’ compared with atorvastatin and fluvastatin. A lower reporting probability was instead found for ICSRs with ADRs belonging to the SOC ‘Psychiatric disorders’ for evolocumab and alirocumab versus simvastatin, pravastatin and rosuvastatin. Conclusion Our results demonstrated that 22.7% of all ICSRs reporting alirocumab or evolocumab as suspect drugs described the occurrence of neuropsychiatric ADRs. The ROR showed that evolocumab and alirocumab had a higher reporting probability of neurological ADRs compared with statins. Further data from real-life contexts are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriella di Mauro & Alessia Zinzi & Cristina Scavone & Annamaria Mascolo & Mario Gaio & Liberata Sportiello & Carmen Ferrajolo & Concetta Rafaniello & Francesco Rossi & Annalisa Capuano, 2021. "PCSK9 Inhibitors and Neurocognitive Adverse Drug Reactions: Analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports from the Eudravigilance Database," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 337-349, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-020-01021-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-01021-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-020-01021-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-020-01021-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:44:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s40264-020-01021-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.