IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v43y2020i9d10.1007_s40264-020-00946-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient-Reported Burden of Adverse Drug Reactions Attributed to Biologics Used for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases

Author

Listed:
  • Jette A. Lint

    (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb)

  • Naomi T. Jessurun

    (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb)

  • Renske C. F. Hebing

    (Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center | Reade)

  • Frank Hoentjen

    (Radboud University Medical Centre)

  • Sander W. Tas

    (AMC/University of Amsterdam)

  • Harald E. Vonkeman

    (Medisch Spectrum Twente
    University of Twente)

  • Martijn B. A. Doorn

    (Erasmus Medical Center)

  • Annemieke Sobels

    (Haga Hospital)

  • Phyllis I. Spuls

    (Location Academic Medical Center)

  • Eugene P. Puijenbroek

    (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb
    Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy University of Groningen)

  • Michael T. Nurmohamed

    (Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center | Reade
    VU University Medical Center)

  • Bart J. F. Bemt

    (Sint Maartenskliniek
    RadboudUMC)

Abstract

Introduction Although the burden of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has a significant impact on patients’ quality of life, thorough knowledge about patients’ perspectives on the burden of ADRs attributed to biologics is lacking. Objectives This study was conducted to gain insight into the patient burden of ADRs experienced with biologic use. Methods The Dutch Biologic Monitor is a prospective, multicentre, event monitoring cohort system including information collected by web-based questionnaires from patients using biologics, mainly for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Patients were asked to complete bimonthly questionnaires on biologics used, indication for the biologic, experienced ADRs, consequences of ADRs and burden on a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (no burden) to 5 (very high burden). We assessed potential factors associated with patient-reported burden of ADRs. Results A total of 1355 patients completed 6293 questionnaires between 1 January 2017 and 1 May 2019. Almost half of the patients (665 patients, 49%), 69% with rheumatic diseases and 31% with other diseases, collectively reported 1720 unique ADRs. Infections and musculoskeletal complaints were the most burdensome ADRs and injection-site reactions were the least burdensome. ADRs leading to healthcare professional contact were more burdensome than ADRs without healthcare professional contact. Smoking, respiratory and psychiatric comorbidities were associated with higher burden of ADRs. Crohn’s disease, use of adalimumab and use of sulfasalazine as combination therapy were associated with lower burden of ADRs. Conclusions The patient perspective gives important insights into the burden of ADRs experienced with biologics. This information could be used by healthcare professionals to optimise treatment with biologics.

Suggested Citation

  • Jette A. Lint & Naomi T. Jessurun & Renske C. F. Hebing & Frank Hoentjen & Sander W. Tas & Harald E. Vonkeman & Martijn B. A. Doorn & Annemieke Sobels & Phyllis I. Spuls & Eugene P. Puijenbroek & Mich, 2020. "Patient-Reported Burden of Adverse Drug Reactions Attributed to Biologics Used for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(9), pages 917-925, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00946-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00946-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-020-00946-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-020-00946-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00946-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.