IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v43y2020i10d10.1007_s40264-020-00962-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neuroprotective Cationic Arginine-Rich Peptides (CARPs): An Assessment of Their Clinical Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Adam B. Edwards

    (Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Sciences
    Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, QEII Medical Centre
    The University of Western Australia)

  • Frank L. Mastaglia

    (Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Sciences
    The University of Western Australia)

  • Neville W. Knuckey

    (Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Sciences
    Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, QEII Medical Centre
    The University of Western Australia)

  • Bruno P. Meloni

    (Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Sciences
    Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, QEII Medical Centre
    The University of Western Australia)

Abstract

Cationic arginine-rich peptides represent a novel class of peptides being developed as neuroprotective agents for stroke and other acute and chronic neurological disorders. As a group, cationic arginine-rich peptides have a diverse range of other biological properties including the ability to traverse cell membranes, modulate immune responses, antagonise ion channel receptor function, as well as possessing cardioprotective, anti-nociceptive, anti-microbial and anti-cancer properties. A sound understanding of their safety profile is essential for the design of future clinical trials and for ensuring translational success with these compounds. At present, while many neuroprotective cationic arginine-rich peptides have been examined in preclinical animal neuroprotection studies, few have been assessed in human safety studies. Despite this, the safety of the prototypical cationic arginine-rich peptide, protamine, which has been in clinical use for over 70 years to reverse the anticoagulant effects of heparin and as an excipient in certain insulin preparations, is well established. In addition, the poly-arginine peptide R9 (ALX40-4C) was developed as an anti-human inmmunodeficiency virus therapeutic in the mid-1990s, and more recently, the neuroprotective cationic arginine-rich peptides TAT-NR2B9c (NA-1), CN-105 and RD2 are being evaluated for the treatment of ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke and Alzheimer’s disease, respectively. Based on the available clinical data, cationic arginine-rich peptides as a group appear to be safe when administered at therapeutic doses by a slow intravenous infusion. While protamine, owing to its isolation from salmon milt and homology with human sperm protamine, can trigger anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions in a small proportion of patients previously exposed to the peptide (e.g. diabetic patients), who are allergic to fish or have undergone a vasectomy, such reactions are unlikely to be triggered in individuals exposed to non-protamine cationic arginine-rich peptides.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam B. Edwards & Frank L. Mastaglia & Neville W. Knuckey & Bruno P. Meloni, 2020. "Neuroprotective Cationic Arginine-Rich Peptides (CARPs): An Assessment of Their Clinical Safety," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(10), pages 957-969, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00962-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00962-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-020-00962-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-020-00962-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00962-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.