IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v43y2020i10d10.1007_s40264-020-00961-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Outcomes Between Direct Oral Anticoagulants, Warfarin, and Antiplatelet Monotherapy Among Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Xue Li

    (University of Hong Kong
    University of Hong Kong
    University of Hong Kong
    The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital)

  • Swathi Pathadka

    (University of Hong Kong)

  • Kenneth K. C. Man

    (University of Hong Kong
    The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital
    UCL School of Pharmacy)

  • Vanessa W. S. Ng

    (University of Hong Kong)

  • Chung Wah Siu

    (University of Hong Kong)

  • Ian C. K. Wong

    (University of Hong Kong
    The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital
    UCL School of Pharmacy)

  • Esther W. Chan

    (University of Hong Kong
    The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital)

  • Wallis C. Y. Lau

    (University of Hong Kong
    The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital
    UCL School of Pharmacy)

Abstract

Introduction Outcomes associated with suboptimal use of antithrombotic treatments (antiplatelets, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) are unclear in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Objectives Our objective was to assess the prescription patterns, quality, effectiveness, and safety of antithrombotic treatments. Methods This was a population-based cohort study using electronic health records in Hong Kong. Patients newly diagnosed with AF during 2010–2016 were followed up until 2017. Patients at high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2) and receiving antithrombotic treatments were matched using propensity scoring. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to compare the risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and all-cause mortality between groups. Results Of the 52,178 high-risk patients with AF, 27,614 (52.9%) received antithrombotic treatment and were included in the analyses. Between 2010 and 2016, prescribing of antiplatelets and warfarin declined and that of DOACs increased dramatically (from 1 to 32%). Two-thirds of warfarin users experienced poor anticoagulation control. Warfarin and DOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke (warfarin, hazard ratio [HR] 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36–0.71]; DOACs, HR 0.69 [95% CI 0.51–0.94]) and all-cause mortality (warfarin, HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.39–0.57]; DOACs, HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.37–0.55]) than were antiplatelets. DOACs were associated with a lower risk of ICH than was warfarin (HR 0.53 [95% CI 0.34–0.83]). GIB risks were similar among all groups. Conclusion Antiplatelet prescribing and suboptimal warfarin management remain common in Chinese patients with AF at high risk of stroke. DOAC use may be associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality when compared with antiplatelets and with a lower risk of ICH when compared with warfarin.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue Li & Swathi Pathadka & Kenneth K. C. Man & Vanessa W. S. Ng & Chung Wah Siu & Ian C. K. Wong & Esther W. Chan & Wallis C. Y. Lau, 2020. "Comparative Outcomes Between Direct Oral Anticoagulants, Warfarin, and Antiplatelet Monotherapy Among Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based Cohort Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(10), pages 1023-1033, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00961-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00961-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-020-00961-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-020-00961-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:43:y:2020:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-020-00961-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.