IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v42y2019i8d10.1007_s40264-019-00811-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishing a Framework for the Use of Social Media in Pharmacovigilance in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Sabine Brosch

    (European Medicines Agency (EMA))

  • Anne-Marie Ferran

    (Sanofi)

  • Victoria Newbould

    (European Medicines Agency (EMA))

  • Diane Farkas

    (Sanofi)

  • Marina Lengsavath

    (Sanofi)

  • Phil Tregunno

    (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency)

Abstract

The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) WEB-RADR (Web-Recognising Adverse Drug Reactions) project looked at opportunities and challenges in using social media in pharmacovigilance as a rapidly evolving source of large, real-time data, which could provide new information on the actual use of medicines and potential safety issues. Two of the objectives were to develop principles for continuous monitoring of the safety of medicines without overburdening established pharmacovigilance systems and to propose a regulatory framework on the use of social media in pharmacovigilance. As a starting point, a review of existing legal requirements and regulatory guidance on social media use in pharmacovigilance was performed based on a survey conducted in 2014–2015. Furthermore, input from two large stakeholder workshops and evidence gathered from the research performed by WEB-RADR on the analysis of social media data were taken into consideration. Whilst analytical results of WEB-RADR indicated limited value of social media in detecting or confirming signals for a majority of the drugs studied, it is important to establish a regulatory framework for the use of social media in pharmacovigilance. Thus, the screening and reporting of suspected adverse reactions remains an important pillar in monitoring the safety and efficacy of medicines and the identification of new safety issues. Principles as to how social media can be used in pharmacovigilance are absolutely needed to provide clarity to patients, healthcare professionals, medicines regulators and the pharmaceutical industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabine Brosch & Anne-Marie Ferran & Victoria Newbould & Diane Farkas & Marina Lengsavath & Phil Tregunno, 2019. "Establishing a Framework for the Use of Social Media in Pharmacovigilance in Europe," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(8), pages 921-930, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:8:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00811-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00811-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-019-00811-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-019-00811-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxim Topaz & Kenneth Lai & Neil Dhopeshwarkar & Diane L. Seger & Roee Sa’adon & Foster Goss & Ronen Rozenblum & Li Zhou, 2016. "Clinicians’ Reports in Electronic Health Records Versus Patients’ Concerns in Social Media: A Pilot Study of Adverse Drug Reactions of Aspirin and Atorvastatin," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 241-250, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucie M. Gattepaille & Sara Hedfors Vidlin & Tomas Bergvall & Carrie E. Pierce & Johan Ellenius, 2020. "Prospective Evaluation of Adverse Event Recognition Systems in Twitter: Results from the Web-RADR Project," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(8), pages 797-808, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:8:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00811-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.