Author
Listed:
- Adrian Wong
(MCPHS University
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Brigham and Women’s Hospital)
- Christine Rehr
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Partners HealthCare)
- Diane L. Seger
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Partners HealthCare)
- Mary G. Amato
(MCPHS University
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Brigham and Women’s Hospital)
- Patrick E. Beeler
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
University Hospital
Harvard Medical School)
- Sarah P. Slight
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Newcastle University
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)
- Adam Wright
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Harvard Medical School)
- David W. Bates
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Harvard Medical School)
Abstract
Introduction Medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) alerts have been shown to be effective at reducing adverse drug events (ADEs). However, these alerts are frequently overridden, with limited data linking these overrides to harm. Dose-range checking alerts are a type of CDS alert that could have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality, especially in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Methods We performed a single-center, prospective, observational study of adult ICUs from September 2016 to April 2017. Targeted overridden alerts were triggered when doses greater than or equal to 5% over the maximum dose were prescribed. The primary outcome was the appropriateness of the override, determined by two independent reviewers, using pre-specified criteria formulated by a multidisciplinary group. Overrides which resulted in medication administration were then evaluated for ADEs by chart review. Results The override rate of high dose-range alerts in the ICU was 93.0% (total n = 1525) during the study period. A total of 1418 overridden alerts from 755 unique patients were evaluated for appropriateness (appropriateness rate 88.8%). The most common medication associated with high dose-range alerts was insulin regular infusion (n = 262, 18.5%). The rates of ADEs for the appropriately and inappropriately overridden alerts per 100 overridden alerts were 1.3 and 5.0, respectively (p
Suggested Citation
Adrian Wong & Christine Rehr & Diane L. Seger & Mary G. Amato & Patrick E. Beeler & Sarah P. Slight & Adam Wright & David W. Bates, 2019.
"Evaluation of Harm Associated with High Dose-Range Clinical Decision Support Overrides in the Intensive Care Unit,"
Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 573-579, April.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0756-x
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0756-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0756-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.