IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v42y2019i1d10.1007_s40264-018-0764-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adverse Drug Events Detection in Clinical Notes by Jointly Modeling Entities and Relations Using Neural Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Bharath Dandala

    (IBM Research)

  • Venkata Joopudi

    (IBM Research)

  • Murthy Devarakonda

    (IBM Research
    Arizona State University)

Abstract

Background and Significance Adverse drug events (ADEs) occur in approximately 2–5% of hospitalized patients, often resulting in poor outcomes or even death. Extraction of ADEs from clinical narratives can accelerate and automate pharmacovigilance. Using state-of-the-art deep-learning neural networks to jointly model concept and relation extraction, we achieved the highest integrated task score in the 2018 Medication and Adverse Drug Event (MADE) 1.0 challenge. Methods We used a combined bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) and conditional random fields (CRF) neural network to detect medical entities relevant to ADEs and a combined BiLSTM and attention network to determine relations, including the adverse drug reaction relation between medication and sign or symptom entities. Using these models, we conducted three experiments: (1) separate and sequential modeling of entities and relations; (2) joint modeling where relations between medications and sign or symptoms determined ADE and indication entities; (3) use of information from external resources such as the US FDA’s adverse event database as additional input to the second method. Results Joint modeling improved the overall task accuracy from 0.62 to 0.65 F measure, and the additional use of external resources improved the accuracy to 0.66 F measure. Given the gold-standard medical entity labels, the joint model plus external resources method achieved F measures of 0.83 for ADE-relevant medical entity detection and 0.87 for relation detection. Conclusion It is important to use joint modeling techniques and external resources for effectively detecting ADEs from clinical narratives in electronic health record (EHR) systems. While the extraction of entities and relations individually achieved high accuracy, the integrated task still has room for further improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Bharath Dandala & Venkata Joopudi & Murthy Devarakonda, 2019. "Adverse Drug Events Detection in Clinical Notes by Jointly Modeling Entities and Relations Using Neural Networks," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 135-146, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0764-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0764-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-0764-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-018-0764-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feifan Liu & Abhyuday Jagannatha & Hong Yu, 2019. "Towards Drug Safety Surveillance and Pharmacovigilance: Current Progress in Detecting Medication and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Records," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 95-97, January.
    2. Abhyuday Jagannatha & Feifan Liu & Weisong Liu & Hong Yu, 2019. "Overview of the First Natural Language Processing Challenge for Extracting Medication, Indication, and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Record Notes (MADE 1.0)," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 99-111, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0764-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.