IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v41y2018i8d10.1007_s40264-018-0669-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Programme for Risk Assessment and Minimisation of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy Developed for Vedolizumab Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Asit Parikh

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.)

  • Kristin Stephens

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.
    Syros Pharmaceuticals)

  • Eugene Major

    (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health)

  • Irving Fox

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.)

  • Catherine Milch

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.
    Eli Lilly and Company)

  • Serap Sankoh

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.
    Syndax Pharmaceuticals)

  • Michael H. Lev

    (Massachusetts General Hospital)

  • James M. Provenzale

    (Duke University Medical Center)

  • Jesse Shick

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc
    Gilead Sciences)

  • Mark Patti

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.)

  • Megan McAuliffe

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.
    Biogen)

  • Joseph R. Berger

    (University of Kentucky
    University of Pennsylvania)

  • David B. Clifford

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

Abstract

Introduction Over the past decade, the potential for drug-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) has become an increasingly important consideration in certain drug development programmes, particularly those of immunomodulatory biologics. Whether the risk of PML with an investigational agent is proven (e.g. extrapolated from relevant experience, such as a class effect) or merely theoretical, the serious consequences of acquiring PML require careful risk minimisation and assessment. No single standard for such risk minimisation exists. Vedolizumab is a recently developed monoclonal antibody to α4β7 integrin. Its clinical development necessitated a dedicated PML risk minimisation assessment as part of a global preapproval regulatory requirement. Objective The aim of this study was to describe the multiple risk minimisation elements that were incorporated in vedolizumab clinical trials in inflammatory bowel disease patients as part of the risk assessment and minimisation of PML programme for vedolizumab. Methods A case evaluation algorithm was developed for sequential screening and diagnostic evaluation of subjects who met criteria that indicated a clinical suspicion of PML. An Independent Adjudication Committee provided an independent, unbiased opinion regarding the likelihood of PML. Results Although no cases were detected, all suspected PML events were thoroughly reviewed and successfully adjudicated, making it unlikely that cases were missed. Conclusion We suggest that this programme could serve as a model for pragmatic screening for PML during the clinical development of new drugs.

Suggested Citation

  • Asit Parikh & Kristin Stephens & Eugene Major & Irving Fox & Catherine Milch & Serap Sankoh & Michael H. Lev & James M. Provenzale & Jesse Shick & Mark Patti & Megan McAuliffe & Joseph R. Berger & Dav, 2018. "A Programme for Risk Assessment and Minimisation of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy Developed for Vedolizumab Clinical Trials," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(8), pages 807-816, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:8:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0669-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0669-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-0669-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-018-0669-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:8:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0669-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.