IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v41y2018i5d10.1007_s40264-017-0629-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drug-Induced Ototoxicity: Diagnosis and Monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen C. M. Campbell

    (Southern Illinois University School of Medicine)

  • Colleen G. Prell

    (University of Texas at Dallas)

Abstract

Ototoxicity diagnosis and management has historically been approached using a variety of methods. However, in recent years a consensus on useful and practical approaches has been developed through clinical guidelines of the American Speech Language Hearing Association, the American Academy of Audiology, and multiple clinical trials published in peer-reviewed literature. Some of the guidelines and approaches are used to detect and monitor ototoxicity, while others are used to grade adverse events. Some of the audiologic measures are primary, while others are adjunct measures and may be tailored to the specific needs of the patient or clinical trial. For some types of monitoring, such as drug-induced tinnitus or dizziness, validated paper survey instruments can be both sensitive and easy for fragile patients. This review addresses the characteristics of some of the most common clinical ototoxins and the most common methods for detecting and monitoring ototoxicity in clinical practice and clinical trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen C. M. Campbell & Colleen G. Prell, 2018. "Drug-Induced Ototoxicity: Diagnosis and Monitoring," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 451-464, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0629-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0629-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0629-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-017-0629-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katijah Khoza-Shangase & Nothando Masondo, 2020. "What Are the Current Audiological Practices for Ototoxicity Assessment and Management in the South African Healthcare Context?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0629-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.