IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v41y2018i11d10.1007_s40264-018-0696-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Profile of Benznidazole in the Treatment of Chronic Chagas Disease: Experience of a Referral Centre and Systematic Literature Review with Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Clara Crespillo-Andújar

    (Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III, IdiPAZ)

  • Emmanuele Venanzi-Rullo

    (University of Messina, Polyclinic “G. Martino”)

  • Rogelio López-Vélez

    (Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS)

  • Begoña Monge-Maillo

    (Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS)

  • Francesca Norman

    (Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS)

  • Ana López-Polín

    (Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS)

  • José A. Pérez-Molina

    (Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS)

Abstract

Introduction Benznidazole is the preferred drug for treatment of Chagas disease. However, it is toxic and of limited value in chronic infection. Objective We aimed to estimate the rates of and factors related to adverse reactions (ARs) to benznidazole and treatment discontinuations (TDs). Methods A meta-analysis was performed using an electronic search of the published literature with no language restrictions until June 2017. Prospective studies were included of chronically infected patients in which at least one treatment arm included benznidazole. Data were added from a prospective cohort of patients with Chagas disease at our centre (January 2007–June 2017). Weighted rates of ARs and TDs were estimated, and potentially related factors were analysed. Results Some 413 studies were found, from which we chose 42 (nine clinical trials and 33 observational studies, including ours), comprising data for 7822 patients. The weighted rate of ARs to benznidazole was 44.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.2–51.2). ARs were more frequent in adults than in children (51.6 vs. 24.5%), with the most common being skin reactions (34%), gastrointestinal complaints (12.6%) and neurological symptoms (11.5%). Grade 4 ARs were recorded in 3% of cases. The weighted rate of TDs was 11.4% (95% CI 8.5–14.5); TDs were more frequent in adults than in children (14.2 vs. 3.8%). In our cohort, only female sex was related to an increased rate of ARs but not to TDs. Conclusion Benznidazole had a poor tolerability profile, with a high incidence of TDs, especially in adult patients and women. Optimised dosing schedules and/or new drugs are urgently needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Clara Crespillo-Andújar & Emmanuele Venanzi-Rullo & Rogelio López-Vélez & Begoña Monge-Maillo & Francesca Norman & Ana López-Polín & José A. Pérez-Molina, 2018. "Safety Profile of Benznidazole in the Treatment of Chronic Chagas Disease: Experience of a Referral Centre and Systematic Literature Review with Meta-Analysis," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(11), pages 1035-1048, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0696-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0696-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-018-0696-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-018-0696-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kota Yoshioka & Jennifer Manne-Goehler & James H Maguire & Michael R Reich, 2020. "Access to Chagas disease treatment in the United States after the regulatory approval of benznidazole," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:41:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-018-0696-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.