IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v40y2017i5d10.1007_s40264-017-0504-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Potentially Drug-Related Patient-Reported Common Symptoms Assessed During Clinical Medication Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Author

Listed:
  • Tim W. A. Schoenmakers

    (Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
    Zorgapotheek Nederland BV)

  • Martina Teichert

    (Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
    Leiden University Medical Center)

  • Michel Wensing

    (Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
    University Hospital Heidelberg)

  • Peter A. G. M. Smet

    (Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
    Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences)

Abstract

Introduction Healthcare professionals tend to consider common non-alarming drug-related symptoms to be of little clinical relevance. However, such symptoms can have a substantial impact on the individual patient. Insight into patient-reported symptoms could aid pharmacists to identify improvements in medication treatment, for instance in the patient interview at the start of a clinical medication review (CMR). Objective The objectives of this study were to describe the numbers and types of patient-reported symptoms assessed during a CMR and to elucidate their potential association with the drugs in use. Methods This observational study was performed using data from a clinical trial on patient-reported outcomes of CMRs. Patients taking at least five drugs and who were eligible for a CMR were selected by 15 community pharmacies. Patients were asked to fill in a structured instrument, the Patient Reported Outcome Measure, Inquiry into Side Effects (PROMISE). Among other domains, this instrument offers a list of 22 symptom categories to report symptoms and their relationship with the drugs in use. The results of the PROMISE instrument together with information on patients’ actual drug use were available for analysis. Besides descriptive analysis, associations with side effects as listed in the summary of product characteristics (SPC) of the drugs in use were assessed with logistic regression analysis. Results Of the 180 patients included, 168 patients (93.3%) reported at least one symptom via the PROMISE instrument, which could be discussed with the pharmacist during the patient interview. In total, the patients reported 1102 symptoms in 22 symptom categories. Of these patients, 101 (56.1%) assumed that at one or more of the symptoms experienced were related to the drugs in use and 107 (59.4%) reported at least one symptom that corresponded to a ‘very common’ side effect listed in the SPC of a drug in use. Each additional drug in use with a specific symptom listed as a ‘very common’ side effect in its SPC statistically significantly increased the probability of a patient reporting the symptoms of ‘dry mouth/thirst, mouth complaints’, ‘constipation’, ‘diarrhoea’ and ‘sweating’. Conclusion Many patient-reported symptoms and symptoms potentially related to drugs in use were identified by administering the PROMISE instrument to users of at least five drugs being taking long-term. This information can be used in CMRs to improve patients’ drug therapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim W. A. Schoenmakers & Martina Teichert & Michel Wensing & Peter A. G. M. Smet, 2017. "Evaluation of Potentially Drug-Related Patient-Reported Common Symptoms Assessed During Clinical Medication Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 419-430, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0504-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0504-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0504-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-017-0504-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renly Lim & Lisa Kalisch Ellett & Elizabeth E. Roughead & Phaik Yeong Cheah & Nashwa Masnoon, 2021. "Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0504-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.