IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v40y2017i11d10.1007_s40264-017-0565-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Relevance and Predictive Value of Damage Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Kidney Injury

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra L. Kane-Gill

    (University of Pittsburgh
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
    University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)

  • Pamela L. Smithburger

    (University of Pittsburgh
    University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)

  • Kianoush Kashani

    (Mayo Clinic
    Mayo Clinic)

  • John A. Kellum

    (University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
    University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine)

  • Erin Frazee

    (Mayo Clinic)

Abstract

Nephrotoxin exposure accounts for up to one-fourth of acute kidney injury episodes in hospitalized patients, and the associated consequences are as severe as acute kidney injury due to other etiologies. As the use of nephrotoxic agents represents one of the few modifiable risk factors for acute kidney injury, clinicians must be able to identify patients at high risk for drug-induced kidney injury rapidly. Recently, significant advancements have been made in the field of biomarker utilization for the prediction and detection of acute kidney injury. Such biomarkers may have a role both for detection of drug-induced kidney disease and implementation of preventative and therapeutic strategies designed to mitigate injury. In this article, basic principles of renal biomarker use in practice are summarized, and the existing evidence for six markers specifically used to detect drug-induced kidney injury are outlined, including liver-type fatty acid binding protein, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 times insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 ([TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7]), kidney injury molecule-1 and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase. The results of the literature search for these six kidney damage biomarkers identified 29 unique articles with none detected for liver-type fatty acid binding protein and [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7]. For three biomarkers, kidney injury molecule-1, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase, the majority of the studies suggest utility in clinical practice. While many questions need to be answered to clearly articulate the use of biomarkers to predict drug-induced kidney disease, current data are promising.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra L. Kane-Gill & Pamela L. Smithburger & Kianoush Kashani & John A. Kellum & Erin Frazee, 2017. "Clinical Relevance and Predictive Value of Damage Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Kidney Injury," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 40(11), pages 1049-1074, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0565-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0565-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0565-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-017-0565-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ravi J. Desai & Christina L. Kazarov & Adrian Wong & Sandra L. Kane-Gill, 2022. "Kidney Damage and Stress Biomarkers for Early Identification of Drug-Induced Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(8), pages 839-852, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0565-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.