IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v40y2017i11d10.1007_s40264-017-0559-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of Parkinsonism or Parkinson Disease with Polypharmacy in the Year Preceding Diagnosis: A Nested Case–Control Study in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hae-Young Park

    (Kyungpook National University)

  • Ji-Won Park

    (Kyungpook National University)

  • Hyun Soon Sohn

    (CHA University)

  • Jin-Won Kwon

    (Kyungpook National University)

Abstract

Introduction Published studies on the association between polypharmacy and parkinsonism or Parkinson disease are very limited. Objective The objective of this study was to investigate whether polypharmacy is associated with parkinsonism or Parkinson disease in elderly patients. Methods From a South Korean national health insurance sample cohort database for 2002–2013, we matched parkinsonism cases (defined by diagnosis codes for parkinsonism/Parkinson disease) and Parkinson disease cases (patients who had records for both Parkinson disease diagnosis and anti-Parkinson disease drug prescriptions) with controls. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the associations of parkinsonism/Parkinson disease with polypharmacy (i.e., five or more prescribed daily drugs) during the year preceding parkinsonism/Parkinson disease diagnosis, medications potentially associated with parkinsonism, and comorbidity status (using the Charlson Comorbidity Index score and hospitalization records). Results The study population included 6209 cases and 24,836 controls for parkinsonism and 1331 cases and 5324 controls for Parkinson disease. In univariate logistic regression, odds ratios for parkinsonism/Parkinson disease increased significantly with increased polypharmacy, medications potentially associated with parkinsonism, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, or prior hospitalizations. In multiple logistic regression, odds ratios for parkinsonism/Parkinson disease (adjusted for medications potentially associated with parkinsonism and comorbidities) also increased with increased polypharmacy. Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for Parkinson disease were higher than those for parkinsonism with stronger statistical significance: 1.41 (1.28–1.55) and 2.17 (1.84–2.57) for parkinsonism and 2.87 (2.30–3.58) and 4.75 (3.39–6.66) for Parkinson disease for between five and ten prescribed daily drugs and ten or more drugs, respectively. Conclusions Polypharmacy in the year preceding diagnosis may be associated with an increased risk for parkinsonism/Parkinson disease. Medications potentially associated with parkinsonism were assumed to increase the risk for parkinsonism/Parkinson disease, but more studies are required to confirm this relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Hae-Young Park & Ji-Won Park & Hyun Soon Sohn & Jin-Won Kwon, 2017. "Association of Parkinsonism or Parkinson Disease with Polypharmacy in the Year Preceding Diagnosis: A Nested Case–Control Study in South Korea," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 40(11), pages 1109-1118, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0559-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0559-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0559-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-017-0559-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0559-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.