IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v40y2017i10d10.1007_s40264-017-0552-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lipophilic Statins and the Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage Following Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Study

Author

Listed:
  • Kieran L. Quinn

    (University of Toronto
    Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre)

  • Erin M. Macdonald

    (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)

  • Muhammad M. Mamdani

    (University of Toronto
    Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
    University of Toronto
    Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital)

  • Christina Diong

    (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)

  • David N. Juurlink

    (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
    University of Toronto
    Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital
    Sunnybrook Research Institute)

Abstract

Background Statins are commonly prescribed for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke, but there is conflicting evidence as to whether they increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Lipophilic statins cross the blood–brain barrier more freely than hydrophilic statins and may therefore increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Objective To determine whether, in older patients following ischemic stroke, receipt of lipophilic statins was associated with differences in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Methods We conducted a population-based nested case-control study linking multiple healthcare databases between 1 April, 2001 and 31 March, 2015 in Ontario, Canada. Cases were Ontarians aged 66 years or older receiving a statin within 100 days preceding the development of intracranial hemorrhage within 1 year following ischemic stroke. Each case was matched with up to four controls who experienced ischemic stroke not complicated by intracranial hemorrhage but who also received a statin. We classified statins as lipophilic (atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin, and cerivastatin) or hydrophilic (pravastatin and rosuvastatin) based on their octanol/water partition coefficients. We calculated the odds ratio for the association between intracranial hemorrhage and receipt of lipophilic statins, with hydrophilic statins as the reference group. Results We identified 2766 individuals who experienced intracranial hemorrhage during statin therapy after ischemic stroke and 11,060 matched controls. Relative to hydrophilic statins, lipophilic statins were not associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval 0.97–1.19). Conclusion Among patients treated with a statin following ischemic stroke, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage is not influenced by statin lipophilicity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kieran L. Quinn & Erin M. Macdonald & Muhammad M. Mamdani & Christina Diong & David N. Juurlink, 2017. "Lipophilic Statins and the Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage Following Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Study," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 40(10), pages 887-893, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0552-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0552-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0552-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-017-0552-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matilda Florentin & Moses S. Elisaf, 2017. "Statin Therapy and Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients with Ischemic Stroke," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 40(10), pages 851-853, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:10:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0552-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.