IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v39y2016i2d10.1007_s40264-015-0358-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Understanding, Preferences, and Responses to Different Versions of Drug Safety Messages in the United States: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Lauren McCormack

    (Center for Communication Science, RTI International)

  • R. Craig Lefebvre

    (Center for Communication Science, RTI International)

  • Carla Bann

    (RTI International)

  • Olivia Taylor

    (Center for Communication Science, RTI International)

  • Paula Rausch

    (US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Communications)

Abstract

Introduction As part of its mission, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) communicates with the public regularly about the benefits and risks of prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. Effectively communicating risk, however, is a significant public health challenge. Objective To better understand how different populations understand information communicated by the FDA about drug safety, we conducted a randomized experiment to examine comprehension and other measures of effectiveness of drug safety messages that occurred in a post-market surveillance phase. Methods We used an Internet panel survey of 1244 consumers, of whom 58 % used prescription drugs in the past year. Half of the sample panel was randomized to read a previous FDA Drug Safety Communication (DSC) with the drug name changed, and the other half was randomized to read a revised version of the same DSC. We examined how making certain modifications to the way drug risk information is communicated has an impact on comprehension and behavioral intentions, including the user’s likelihood of discontinuing the drug. We also studied how comprehension varied by respondent characteristics, health literacy skills, risk perceptions, and trust in the message. Results Based on a five-item comprehension index, the revised version of the message was associated with significantly greater comprehension of the information relative to the standard version (63 vs 52 % correct, p

Suggested Citation

  • Lauren McCormack & R. Craig Lefebvre & Carla Bann & Olivia Taylor & Paula Rausch, 2016. "Consumer Understanding, Preferences, and Responses to Different Versions of Drug Safety Messages in the United States: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 171-184, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:39:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s40264-015-0358-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-015-0358-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-015-0358-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-015-0358-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aaron S. Kesselheim & Michael S. Sinha & Eric G. Campbell & Sebastian Schneeweiss & Paula Rausch & Brian M. Lappin & Esther H. Zhou & Jerry Avorn & Gerald J. Dal Pan, 2019. "Multimodal Analysis of FDA Drug Safety Communications: Lessons from Zolpidem," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(11), pages 1287-1295, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:39:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s40264-015-0358-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.