IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v39y2016i12d10.1007_s40264-016-0449-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vaccine Case–Population: A New Method for Vaccine Safety Surveillance

Author

Listed:
  • Hélène Théophile

    (CHU Bordeaux)

  • Nicholas Moore

    (CHU Bordeaux
    INSERM CR 1219
    University of Bordeaux)

  • Philip Robinson

    (CIC Bordeaux CIC1401
    ADERA)

  • Bernard Bégaud

    (CHU Bordeaux
    INSERM CR 1219
    University of Bordeaux)

  • Antoine Pariente

    (CHU Bordeaux
    INSERM CR 1219
    University of Bordeaux)

Abstract

Introduction The case–population approach compares exposure among cases to that of their source population. By using aggregated data to estimate the denominator, this approach can provide a real-time estimate of an association that could be particularly valuable to explore urgent vaccine safety concerns and to generate signals during a vaccine campaign. Objective Our objective was to present the vaccine case–population method, a method derived from the case–population approach and adapted for vaccine safety surveillance, and to test it using several published examples. Methods For the vaccine case–population method, exposure in the population is estimated from the sum of at-risk periods using the number of vaccinated individuals, or data of vaccine sales, and the at-risk period considered for the vaccine–event pair. The vaccine case–population method was applied to data from published case–control studies retrieved from the MEDLINE database and having quantified risks associated with vaccines. Odds ratios derived from the vaccine case–population method were compared with those from published case–control studies. Results A total of 20 vaccine–event pairs were retrieved in which the vaccine case–population method could be applied. For all identified vaccine–event pairs, when a significant association was found using the vaccine case–population method, a significant association was also found in the corresponding case–control study. Conversely, when no association was found by the vaccine case–population method, no association was found in the corresponding case–control study. Conclusion These results suggest that the vaccine case–population method can produce coherent conclusions and may be used in the future for prospective investigation of urgent vaccine safety concerns or for the prospective generation of vaccine safety signals. This method could also be used to identify selection bias from cases excluded from the case–control study.

Suggested Citation

  • Hélène Théophile & Nicholas Moore & Philip Robinson & Bernard Bégaud & Antoine Pariente, 2016. "Vaccine Case–Population: A New Method for Vaccine Safety Surveillance," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 39(12), pages 1197-1209, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:39:y:2016:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-016-0449-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-016-0449-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-016-0449-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-016-0449-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:39:y:2016:i:12:d:10.1007_s40264-016-0449-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.