IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/digfin/v2y2020i3d10.1007_s42521-020-00024-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting S&P 500 spikes: an SVM approach

Author

Listed:
  • Theophilos Papadimitriou

    (Democritus University of Thrace)

  • Periklis Gogas

    (Democritus University of Thrace)

  • Athanasios Fotios Athanasiou

    (Democritus University of Thrace)

Abstract

In this study, we focus on forecasting long-tail events of the S&P 500 stock returns. The S&P 500 is widely considered as a bellwether for the overall US economy as it encompasses some of the largest—in terms of capitalization—corporations from both the NYSE and the NASDAQ stock exchanges. A timely and efficient forecast of such extreme changes is of great importance to market participants and policy makers, since they may trigger large scale selling or buying strategies that may significantly impact the specific market and the overall economy. We define as “spikes” the events where we have extreme upward or downward changes of the S&P 500 index; in our case, we use the returns that fall outside a two-standard deviations band. However, instead of simply using the unconditional overall standard deviation, in this paper we employ a GARCH (p,q) model to derive the conditional standard deviation of the returns. This is a more appropriate measure of immediate risk to market participants than the overall series’ unconditional standard deviation. Traditional forecasting models that rely on statistical analysis and traditional econometrics, assume that the returns follow some typical underlying distribution. These models usually fail to successfully and efficiently accommodate price spikes especially when it comes to forecasting. In our study, we use the atheoretical and data-driven Support Vector Machines methodology from the area of Machine Learning. This forecasting approach does not require any initial assumptions on the distribution of the data but rather exploits patterns that may be inhibited in the initial data space. These patterns may become more apparent and exploitable in the resulting feature space. We use 1860 daily observations from 01/01/2009 to 22/01/2017. Our overall optimum forecasting model achieved a 70.69% forecasting accuracy for the spikes and 73.25% for non-spikes.

Suggested Citation

  • Theophilos Papadimitriou & Periklis Gogas & Athanasios Fotios Athanasiou, 2020. "Forecasting S&P 500 spikes: an SVM approach," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 241-258, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:digfin:v:2:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s42521-020-00024-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s42521-020-00024-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42521-020-00024-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42521-020-00024-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vasilios Plakandaras & Theophilos Papadimitriou & Periklis Gogas, 2015. "Forecasting Daily and Monthly Exchange Rates with Machine Learning Techniques," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), pages 560-573, November.
    2. Schwert, G William & Seguin, Paul J, 1990. "Heteroskedasticity in Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(4), pages 1129-1155, September.
    3. Rechenthin, Michael & Street, W. Nick & Srinivasan, Padmini, 2013. "Stock chatter: Using stock sentiment to predict price direction," Algorithmic Finance, IOS Press, vol. 2(3-4), pages 169-196.
    4. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    5. Hjalmarsson, Erik, 2010. "Predicting Global Stock Returns," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 49-80, February.
    6. Awartani, Basel M.A. & Corradi, Valentina, 2005. "Predicting the volatility of the S&P-500 stock index via GARCH models: the role of asymmetries," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 167-183.
    7. McMillan, David G., 2005. "Non-linear dynamics in international stock market returns," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 81-91.
    8. Joseph, Kissan & Babajide Wintoki, M. & Zhang, Zelin, 2011. "Forecasting abnormal stock returns and trading volume using investor sentiment: Evidence from online search," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 1116-1127, October.
    9. Engle, Robert F, 1982. "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 987-1007, July.
    10. Nelson, Daniel B, 1991. "Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 347-370, March.
    11. McNeil, Alexander J. & Frey, Rudiger, 2000. "Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: an extreme value approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(3-4), pages 271-300, November.
    12. Asim Ghosh, 1993. "Hedging with stock index futures: Estimation and forecasting with error correction model," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(7), pages 743-752, October.
    13. Nofer, Michael & Hinz, Oliver, 2015. "Using Twitter to Predict the Stock Market: Where is the Mood Effect?," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 77140, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    14. Periklis Gogas & Apostolos Serletis, 2009. "Forecasting in inefficient commodity markets," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(4), pages 383-392, September.
    15. Michael Nofer & Oliver Hinz, 2015. "Using Twitter to Predict the Stock Market," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(4), pages 229-242, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Firuz Kamalov & Linda Smail & Ikhlaas Gurrib, 2021. "Forecasting with Deep Learning: S&P 500 index," Papers 2103.14080, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Hung-Chun & Chiang, Shu-Mei & Cheng, Nick Ying-Pin, 2012. "Forecasting the volatility of S&P depositary receipts using GARCH-type models under intraday range-based and return-based proxy measures," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 78-91.
    2. Dimitrakopoulos, Dimitris N. & Kavussanos, Manolis G. & Spyrou, Spyros I., 2010. "Value at risk models for volatile emerging markets equity portfolios," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 515-526, November.
    3. Ñíguez, Trino-Manuel & Perote, Javier, 2017. "Moments expansion densities for quantifying financial risk," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 53-69.
    4. Mehmet Sahiner, 2022. "Forecasting volatility in Asian financial markets: evidence from recursive and rolling window methods," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(10), pages 1-74, October.
    5. Kanungo, Rama Prasad, 2021. "Uncertainty of M&As under asymmetric estimation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 774-793.
    6. Hartz, Christoph & Mittnik, Stefan & Paolella, Marc S., 2006. "Accurate Value-at-Risk forecast with the (good old) normal-GARCH model," CFS Working Paper Series 2006/23, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    7. Turan Bali & Panayiotis Theodossiou, 2007. "A conditional-SGT-VaR approach with alternative GARCH models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 241-267, April.
    8. Daglis, Theodoros & Konstantakis, Konstantinos N. & Michaelides, Panayotis G. & Papadakis, Theodoulos Eleftherios, 2020. "The forecasting ability of solar and space weather data on NASDAQ’s finance sector price index volatility," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    9. Chang, Chia-Lin & González-Serrano, Lydia & Jimenez-Martin, Juan-Angel, 2013. "Currency hedging strategies using dynamic multivariate GARCH," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 164-182.
    10. Halkos, George E. & Tsirivis, Apostolos S., 2019. "Effective energy commodity risk management: Econometric modeling of price volatility," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 234-250.
    11. Wu, Qi & Yan, Xing, 2019. "Capturing deep tail risk via sequential learning of quantile dynamics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Tim Bollerslev, 2008. "Glossary to ARCH (GARCH)," CREATES Research Papers 2008-49, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    13. Şener, Emrah & Baronyan, Sayad & Ali Mengütürk, Levent, 2012. "Ranking the predictive performances of value-at-risk estimation methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 849-873.
    14. Koliai, Lyes, 2016. "Extreme risk modeling: An EVT–pair-copulas approach for financial stress tests," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-22.
    15. Bali, Turan G. & Weinbaum, David, 2007. "A conditional extreme value volatility estimator based on high-frequency returns," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 361-397, February.
    16. St. Pierre, Eileen F., 1998. "Estimating EGARCH-M models: Science or art?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 167-180.
    17. Kumar Arya & Sahoo Jyotirmayee & Sahoo Jyotsnarani & Nanda Subhashree & Debyani Devi, 2024. "Exploring Asymmetric GARCH Models for Predicting Indian Base Metal Price Volatility," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 24(1), pages 105-123.
    18. repec:agr:journl:v:4(621):y:2019:i:4(621):p:35-52 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Viviane Naimy & José-María Montero & Rim El Khoury & Nisrine Maalouf, 2020. "Market Volatility of the Three Most Powerful Military Countries during Their Intervention in the Syrian War," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Jimenez-Martin, Juan-Angel & McAleer, Michael & Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio & Santos, Paulo Araújo, 2013. "GFC-robust risk management under the Basel Accord using extreme value methodologies," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 223-237.
    21. Wang, Yuanfang & Roberts, Matthew C., 2005. "Realized Volatility in the Agricultural Futures Market," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19211, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Forecast; Machine learning; Support vector machines; Spikes; S&P 500; GARCH;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:digfin:v:2:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s42521-020-00024-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.