IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/demogr/v19y1982i3p301-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Race differences in age at first birth and the pace of subsequent fertility: Implications for the minority group status hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Craig St. John

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig St. John, 1982. "Race differences in age at first birth and the pace of subsequent fertility: Implications for the minority group status hypothesis," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 19(3), pages 301-314, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:19:y:1982:i:3:p:301-314
    DOI: 10.2307/2060973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2060973
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2060973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larry Bumpass & Ronald Rindfuss & Richard Jamosik, 1978. "Age and marital status at first birth and the pace of subsequent fertility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 15(1), pages 75-86, February.
    2. Reynolds Farley, 1966. "Recent changes in Negro fertility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 3(1), pages 188-203, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Stephen & Ronald Rindfuss & Frank Bean, 1988. "Racial differences in contraceptive choice: Complexity and implications," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 25(1), pages 53-70, February.
    2. Jay Teachman & Daniel Heckert, 1985. "The Declining Significance of First-Birth Timing," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 22(2), pages 185-198, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chal Park, 1976. "Lifetime probability of additional births by age and parity for American women, 1935–1968: A new measurement of period fertility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Laura Tach & Kathryn Edin & Hope Harvey & Brielle Bryan, 2014. "The Family-Go-Round," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 654(1), pages 169-184, July.
    3. Francesca Modena & Concetta Rondinelli & Fabio Sabatini, 2014. "Economic Insecurity and Fertility Intentions: The Case of Italy," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(S1), pages 233-255, May.
    4. Menghan Zhao & Yang Zhang, 2019. "Parental childcare support, sibship status and mothers’ second-child plans in urban China," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(47), pages 1315-1346.
    5. Kazenin, Konstantin (Казенин, Константин), 2017. "The Impact of Social Changes on Fertility in the Regions of the North Caucasus [Влияние Социальных Изменений На Рождаемость В Регионах Северного Кавказа]," Working Papers 061706, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    6. Frank Furstenberg & Natalia Melgar & Máximo Rossi, 2011. "When do people become adults? The Uruguayan case," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 2611, Department of Economics - dECON.
    7. Andrew S. London & Cheryl Elman, 2017. "Race, Remarital Status, and Infertility in 1910: More Evidence of Multiple Causes," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(5), pages 1949-1972, October.
    8. David Alich, 2006. "The third child: a comparison between West Germany and Norway," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2006-001, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    9. Hill, Matthew J., 2015. "Easterlin revisited: Relative income and the baby boom," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 71-85.
    10. Matthew J. Hill, 2014. "Easterlin revisted: Relative income and the baby boom," Economics Working Papers 1453, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    11. David K. Guilkey & Ronald R. Rindfuss, 1987. "Logistic Regression Multivariate Life Tables," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 16(2), pages 276-300, November.
    12. John Billy & Nancy Landale & Steven McLaughlin, 1986. "The effect of marital status at first birth on marital dissolution among adolescent mothers," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 23(3), pages 329-349, August.
    13. John Tomkinson, 2019. "Age at first birth and subsequent fertility: The case of adolescent mothers in France and England and Wales," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(27), pages 761-798.
    14. Edith Gray & Ann Evans & Jon Anderson & Rebecca Kippen, 2010. "Using Split-Population Models to Examine Predictors of the Probability and Timing of Parity Progression," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 26(3), pages 275-295, August.
    15. Larry Long, 1970. "Fertility patterns among religious groups in Canada," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 7(2), pages 135-149, May.
    16. Thomas Pullum & Lucky Tedrow & Jerald Herting, 1989. "Measuring change and continuity in parity distributions," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 26(3), pages 485-498, August.
    17. Jay Teachman & Daniel Heckert, 1985. "The Declining Significance of First-Birth Timing," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 22(2), pages 185-198, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:19:y:1982:i:3:p:301-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.