IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v33y2018i1d10.1007_s00180-017-0727-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objective Bayesian model selection approach to the two way analysis of variance

Author

Listed:
  • J. A. Cano

    (Universidad de Murcia)

  • C. Carazo

    (Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia)

  • D. Salmerón

    (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
    IMIB-Arrixaca
    Universidad de Murcia)

Abstract

An objective Bayesian procedure for testing in the two way analysis of variance is proposed. In the classical methodology the main effects of the two factors and the interaction effect are formulated as linear contrasts between means of normal populations, and hypotheses of the existence of such effects are tested. In this paper, for the first time these hypotheses have been formulated as objective Bayesian model selection problems. Our development is under homoscedasticity and heteroscedasticity, providing exact solutions in both cases. Bayes factors are the key tool to choose between the models under comparison but for the usual default prior distributions they are not well defined. To avoid this difficulty Bayes factors for intrinsic priors are proposed and they are applied in this setting to test the existence of the main effects and the interaction effect. The method has been illustrated with an example and compared with the classical method. For this example, both approaches went in the same direction although the large P value for interaction (0.79) only prevents us against to reject the null, and the posterior probability of the null (0.95) was conclusive.

Suggested Citation

  • J. A. Cano & C. Carazo & D. Salmerón, 2018. "Objective Bayesian model selection approach to the two way analysis of variance," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 235-248, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:33:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0727-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-017-0727-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-017-0727-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-017-0727-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Cano & C. Carazo & D. Salmerón, 2013. "Bayesian model selection approach to the one way analysis of variance under homoscedasticity," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 919-931, June.
    2. Juan Cano & Mathieu Kessler & Elías Moreno, 2004. "On intrinsic priors for nonnested models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 13(2), pages 445-463, December.
    3. Cano, J.A. & Carazo, C. & Salmerón, D., 2016. "Linear contrasts for the one way analysis of variance: A Bayesian approach," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 54-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valen E. Johnson & David Rossell, 2010. "On the use of non‐local prior densities in Bayesian hypothesis tests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(2), pages 143-170, March.
    2. J. A. Cano & M. Iniesta & D. Salmerón, 2018. "Integral priors for Bayesian model selection: how they operate from simple to complex cases," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(4), pages 968-987, December.
    3. J. Cano & D. Salmerón & C. Robert, 2008. "Integral equation solutions as prior distributions for Bayesian model selection," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(3), pages 493-504, November.
    4. Cano, J.A. & Carazo, C. & Salmerón, D., 2016. "Linear contrasts for the one way analysis of variance: A Bayesian approach," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 54-62.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:33:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0727-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.