IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v4y1998i3d10.1023_a1009644511252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communication Roles, Perceived Effectiveness, and Satisfaction in an Environmental Management Program

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey C. Johnson

    (East Carolina University)

  • Dawn L. Parks

    (Indiana University)

Abstract

Earlier research has shown a relationship between various forms of structural centrality and perceived leadership and role satisfaction in small experimental groups. The limited amount of research on this topic in naturally occurring social networks has yielded results that often conflict with one another. Different results have generally been attributed to possible differences in task environments. This paper examines the relationship between two types of structural centrality and perceived influence, role satisfaction, and perceived effectiveness in an environmental resource management program. Findings in this paper suggest that the observed differences in relationships between the network and other variables is partly a function of global network properties (e.g., marginality of subgroups) and related task environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey C. Johnson & Dawn L. Parks, 1998. "Communication Roles, Perceived Effectiveness, and Satisfaction in an Environmental Management Program," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 223-239, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:4:y:1998:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1009644511252
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1009644511252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1009644511252
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1009644511252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:4:y:1998:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1009644511252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.