IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v30y2024i2d10.1007_s10588-023-09383-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is more always better? Unveiling the impact of contributor dynamics on collaborative mapping

Author

Listed:
  • Aylin McGough

    (George Mason University)

  • Hamdi Kavak

    (George Mason University)

  • Ron Mahabir

    (University of Liverpool)

Abstract

Open, collaborative mapping initiatives such as OpenStreetMap, a wiki-style map of the world, continually face concerns about the reliability and authority of its data. Based on harnessing the power of millions of volunteers globally, the data production process is decentralized and reflects a mosaic of individual contributors’ skills, motivations, and experiences. Linus’ Law, a widespread assumption within open-source communities, suggests that data quality increases with the number of contributors. In this paper, we evaluate Linus’ Law as applied to the co-production of volunteered geographic information using an agent-based model and examine the effects of knowledge level, variability, and prioritization on emergent production patterns and overall data quality. Our results demonstrate how diminishing returns and the experience of contributors limit Linus’ Law as an intrinsic assessment of data quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Aylin McGough & Hamdi Kavak & Ron Mahabir, 2024. "Is more always better? Unveiling the impact of contributor dynamics on collaborative mapping," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 173-186, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:30:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-023-09383-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-023-09383-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-023-09383-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-023-09383-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:30:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-023-09383-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.