IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v29y2023i1d10.1007_s10588-021-09349-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What can simulation test beds teach us about social science? Results of the ground truth program

Author

Listed:
  • Asmeret Naugle

    (Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque)

  • Daniel Krofcheck

    (Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque)

  • Christina Warrender

    (Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque)

  • Kiran Lakkaraju

    (Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque)

  • Laura Swiler

    (Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque)

  • Stephen Verzi

    (Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque)

  • Ben Emery

    (Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque)

  • Jaimie Murdock

    (Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque)

  • Michael Bernard

    (Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque)

  • Vicente Romero

    (Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque)

Abstract

The ground truth program used simulations as test beds for social science research methods. The simulations had known ground truth and were capable of producing large amounts of data. This allowed research teams to run experiments and ask questions of these simulations similar to social scientists studying real-world systems, and enabled robust evaluation of their causal inference, prediction, and prescription capabilities. We tested three hypotheses about research effectiveness using data from the ground truth program, specifically looking at the influence of complexity, causal understanding, and data collection on performance. We found some evidence that system complexity and causal understanding influenced research performance, but no evidence that data availability contributed. The ground truth program may be the first robust coupling of simulation test beds with an experimental framework capable of teasing out factors that determine the success of social science research.

Suggested Citation

  • Asmeret Naugle & Daniel Krofcheck & Christina Warrender & Kiran Lakkaraju & Laura Swiler & Stephen Verzi & Ben Emery & Jaimie Murdock & Michael Bernard & Vicente Romero, 2023. "What can simulation test beds teach us about social science? Results of the ground truth program," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 242-263, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:29:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10588-021-09349-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-021-09349-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-021-09349-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-021-09349-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:29:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10588-021-09349-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.