IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v19y2013i3d10.1007_s10588-012-9138-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automatic validation and failure diagnosis of human-device interfaces using task analytic models and model checking

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew L. Bolton

    (University of Illinois at Chicago)

Abstract

When evaluating designs of human-device interfaces for safety critical systems, it is very important that they support the goal-directed tasks they were designed to facilitate. This paper describes a novel method that generates task-related temporal logic properties from task analytic models created early in the system design process. This allows analysts to use model checking (a means of performing exhaustive mathematical proofs) to automatically validate that formal models of human-device interfaces will let human operators successfully perform the necessary tasks with the system. This paper also presents an algorithm that uses the method to diagnose why a particular task is not valid for a given design. The application of both the method and algorithm are illustrated with a patient-controlled analgesia pump programming example. The method and algorithm are discussed and avenues for future work are described.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew L. Bolton, 2013. "Automatic validation and failure diagnosis of human-device interfaces using task analytic models and model checking," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 288-312, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:19:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s10588-012-9138-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-012-9138-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-012-9138-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-012-9138-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catholijn M. Jonker & Martijn C. Schut & Jan Treur & Pınar Yolum, 2007. "Analysis of meeting protocols by formalisation, simulation, and verification," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 283-314, September.
    2. Shane T. Mueller & Benjamin Simpkins & George Anno & Corey K. Fallon & Owen Price & Gene E. McClellan, 2011. "Adapting the task-taxon-task methodology to model the impact of chemical protective gear," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 251-271, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank E. Ritter & William G. Kennedy & Bradley J. Best, 2013. "The best papers from BRIMS 2011: models of users and teams interacting," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 283-287, September.
    2. William G. Kennedy & Frank E. Ritter & Bradley J. Best, 2011. "Behavioral representation in modeling and simulation introduction to CMOT special issue—BRiMS 2010," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 225-228, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:19:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s10588-012-9138-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.